Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Category: Living Newspaper

  • Why NewsWrights United Matters

    Why NewsWrights United Matters

    Wes Andrews,  the New Media Analyst and Dramaturg for NewsWrights United, asked each of our creative team members to write a short essay for our blog on why this project matters to them. This one’s my stab.

    Fresh theatre is living theatre.

    I hold this truth to be self-evident.

    I have held it so for a very long time, but have only argued it publically and formally for about 9 months, since launching my blog Just Wrought, and its first in a series of essays, “Theatre Takes Place: Why Locally Grown Plays Matter”.  By itself, the notion is not terribly controversial. The argument comes when we theatre professionals attempt to determine whether you can make something fresh with 10 year-old, 20-year-old, 50-year old and 500-year old ingredients. I say, “Well… sometimes.” My esteemed adversaries in this ongoing argument defiantly avow “Always!”, and then they sink a staggering amount of effort into convincing their audience, and more importantly, themselves that that so long as one has excellently trained and accomplished actors, insightful and renowned directors and designers, plenty of money from donors and a cultured public, one can always make the already existing great plays of the canon fresh.

    I disagree.

    In reality you need actual fresh content to keep theatre relevant and alive.  And fresh content only comes from creating new plays. Thus, as much as the ascendancy of “The Director” in the 19th Century, and “The Artistic Director” in the 20th, seemed to herald the demise of the playwright, the playwright remains a necessary component— perhaps the necessary component—of ensuring theatre remains a living—and not merely a museum– art form.

    We at NewsWrights United believe that employing the theatrical form of the living newspaper to cover local news is one of the best ways of injecting fresh, locally compelling, material into the theatrical canon. That alone, however, is not enough to answer why this project matters. Happily, when we produced our first edition It’s Not in the P-I: A Living Newspaper about a Dying Newspaper, we noticed an added bonus. The people came—and we sold out nearly every night—not to see excellent theatre adeptly presented by trained professionals but rather stories about a local newspaper that they loved (or hated) that had died recently. In other words, they came to see themselves.

    When theatre offers the new and the relevant, it matters and lives.   When it offers only  the polished and perfect– plays we all already know– it dies a museum death.  We are doing this project because journalism matters. We are also doing it because theatre matters. When blended they achieve an almost explosive synergy.

    Why?

    It’s simple. Audiences matter. Stories matter. The rest is icing. Sometimes icing is delightful, but it will not keep you alive forever.

    I hope you will join us Monday evening, November 15 for  . . .

    Journalism: a.WAKE.ning?  

    Tickets for the event are $20 and are available at Brown Paper Tickets (http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/133319) or may be purchased at the door.

    Or if you cannot make it, please consider helping us out with a donation.  Below is our support hat.  You can start filling it by clicking on it.  It’ll take you to our Shunpike donation page.  

    Donation hat

    Early support is always deeply appreciated support.  So thanks.

  • Get your Tix Now for the Journalism/Theatre Event of the Year

    Get your Tix Now for the Journalism/Theatre Event of the Year

    Tickets just $20 at Brown Paper Tickets.

    Monday November 15, 2010 – 7:30-9:30pm

    The Upstairs Gallery above Theatre Off Jackson

    NewsWrights United is throwing a party. What kind of party is up to you.

    Do you want to toast the rebirth of journalism, or drown your sorrows at its untimely demise?

    We’ll start your evening with a complimentary glass of champagne or shot of rye (toasting or drowning?). Visual art and installations, complimentary hors d’oeuvres and a cash bar await you in the gallery.

    We’ll offer up a preview scene from our upcoming Living Newspaper, The New New News, and highlight the evening with a panel discussion on new media and journalism moderated by NewsWrights producer Tom Paulson and featuring Pulitzer Prize-winning P-I political cartoonist Dave Horsey, Monica Guzman of Intersect.com, Publicola‘s Josh Feit, local sportswriting legend Art Thiel, The Stranger theatre critic Brendan Kiley, and Chris Grygiel, coordinator of political coverage for the P-I blogs.

    Get ‘em now before the all get got!

    Tickets just $20 at Brown Paper Tickets.

  • I Hate Being Prescient

    Okay, honestly, when I posted “Let’s Put a Bullet in the Ugliest Rumor” on Monday I had no idea that the Managing Director of Intiman, Brian Colburn would be tendering his resignation for “personal reasons” that very same day.  And I sure as hell didn’t know anything about the rumor now running rampant today on the inside of Seattle’s regional theatre scene that Intiman is on the edge of going belly up.  I am hearing that “They are a million in debt, haven’t paid taxes, health care, union dues, or L&I and have spent their endowment and bonds.” 

    So is it true?  I honestly don’t know.  I just playact as a journalist over at NewsWrights United, but I do think it is high time for Kate Whoriskey to come out from behind the curtain and start reassuring her public.

    Kate?  The call is places.

  • The Poem that Started All This*

    The Poem that Started All This*

    Simple Sympathy

    Bill calls because you’re still
    angry, not at him, but everything.
    Bill wouldn’t call if you were just angry at him.

    So, instead of walking to the water’s edge to sit
    zazen on the spot on the bench someone carved PAUL
    into years before you appeared with your dumb ritual

    — bowing once before it, turning, bowing again to the sound,
    then sitting, bowing again and then just sitting
    maybe fifteen, eighteen minutes in all weather–

    you rant over the wind’s blow into the cell phone and Bill,
    like a patient boxing coach with sparring mitts gives
    you just enough flat punchback to keep you  swinging, bleeding

    off just enough of your blockheaded hate
    for feckless actors and administrators in a rag doll
    death dying theatre and mostly your own damned self

    for writing another damned play to put on a shelf
    over and over putting yourself here,
    in front of these waves strangely 


    luminous, ominous, heaving the sound
    in sympathy,  or so it seems,
    to your simple mind.

    Said spot where I sit zazen. 

     *The create date on the Word file containing this poem is Monday, October 26, 2009, exactly a year ago today.  Obviously, I was stuck in a very frustrated place.  I had just learned that the theatre in Southern California that seemed so eager to premiere my farce Gossamer Grudges had suddenly, unaccountably and irrevocably lost interest. We at NewsWrights United were also starting to realize that a certain “nice” leader within Seattle’s regional theatre echelons was not, in fact, going to come through on his glad-handing promises of resources and good will for the first edition of our Living Newspaper, It’s Not in the P-I.  I was feeling fucked, frankly, and very deeply sorry for myself. 

    Anger has always been a part of my life.  Twenty years of Zen practice has not changed that and I doubt the remainder of a lifetime will.  Anger is part of who I am.  On the other hand, anger is not always inappropriate.  Certainly when it comes to Seattle’s current theatre situation, the old hippy adage applies: “If you’re not outraged you’re not paying attention.”  And, of course, anger unshared is absolutely no fun at all.

    I didn’t know it then, but within a few weeks of howling out this poem, I would begin planning the essays that I started posting here last December.  I suspect Bill Salyers is glad that I now have this place to vent.  For my part, I am grateful too to have Just Wrought, but much so much more grateful that I have my Zen practice, friends like Bill, and the wide open daunting weather of the Puget Sound in autumn, vast enough to humble any marginally sane human being.

    Full disclosure:  I reworked the poem a bit since I first posted it on Face Book a year ago.

  • Watching the Sausage Get Made with NewsWrights United

    Watching the Sausage Get Made with NewsWrights United

    Nine out of every ten public play readings are exercises in vanity.  Despite what we may earnestly espouse about “works-in-progress” or “rough first drafts” we playwrights tend to avoid sharing our work in anything other than what we judge to be the highest states of perfection. I am more guilty of perpetrating this soft con than most, because arrogant ass that I am I tend to think of my plays as perfect even when they manifestly are not.  The reason playwrights deceive the audiences of play readings like this— not to mention the theatres that host them —and quite often ourselves as well— is simple: we do not usually want your helpful feedback, no matter how earnestly we plead to the contrary.  We just want to showcase our plays and convince theaters to produce them.  Alas, at that latter goal we nearly never succeed.

    NewsWrights United will be doing something completely different at 7pm this Sunday night Oct. 24 at North Seattle Community College’s Stage One.  We don’t need to convince anyone to produce the second edition of A Living Newspaper, titled The New New News.  We will be producing it ourselves in February 2011 with the gNewsWrights Donation hatenerous financial support of 4Culture, Vulcan and individual donors like yourself.  (You can click and pledge on our handy upside down donation fedora if you care to give us an early boost. )

    The proto-script we will be reading Sunday night is a big hot mess, full of great local stories about the current crisis in journalism, but also riddled with yawning narrative gaps, inconsistencies and dramaturgic sacred cows begging to be sacrificed.  We actually do need your feedback and suggestions for how to make the play better.  If you join us Sunday night, instead of hearing a polished, polite and, frankly, boring “audition reading” you will be participating in a process much more akin to the 10 a.m. “front page meeting” at a major newspaper like The Seattle Times when the editorial staff first starts to choose and shape the major stories they will be covering in the next day’s edition.

    Like theatre is supposed to be but almost never is at, say,  Seattle’s Big Houses, this reading of The New New News: A Living Newspaper will be messy, ardent, relevant, and fun.   But perfect?  Not so much.

     Making Sausage!

  • NewsWrights United has Hit the Ground, and We are Running

    NewsWrights United has Hit the Ground, and We are Running

    A few days ago the NewsWrights United’s Managing Producer, Jim Jewell, sent out a kick-off press release to all sorts of fancy media folks about NewsWrights United and our upcoming production The New New News: A Living Newspaper.  In it he made a few key announcements:

    • NewsWrights United will be producing a second edition of our Living Newspaper called The New New News, on the heels of the frankly astounding success of our first edition It’s Not In the P-I: A Living Newspaper about a Dying NewspaperThe New New News will provide a theatrical examination of the rise of new media and how we know what we know… or not.
    • NewsWrights United will be tossing this Living Newspaper up onto your theatrical doorstep in February of 2011 (and by “theatrical doorstep” I mean a Seattle stage or stages to be named later.)
    • NewsWrights United just launched our blog, conveniently located at http://newswrightsunited.blogspot.com/.  On this blog my fellow writer/producers and I will do our best to keep up-to-date on our progress developing The New New News for production.  As much as we can, we keep you apprised of our hopes, our fears, our failures, and ideally, our ultimate triumph.   See?  That’s what’s exciting about locally grown, intensely fresh new work.  The outcome is not a foregone conclusion.  Following us is like rooting for a local sports team, whereas supporting our more museumified colleagues is more like, well, supporting a museum.  (Tantamount-to-dead things don’t readily engender lively metaphors.)
    • NewsWrights United just launched a “wiki-scene” here, where anyone who wants to can help us write a section of the upcoming show.
    • We have a web page: http://www.newswrightsunited.org  it ain’t super fancy yet, but it will be.  (And any support you can offer us in that regard would be most welcome.)
    • We will be hosting  an awareness-building/fund-raising event on the evening of Monday, November 15, tentatively titled Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? in the Upstairs Gallery above Theatre Off Jackson, from 7:30 – 9:30 PM.  The event will include art installations examining new media, a preview of The New New News, a panel discussion on coverage of the November elections and, of course, a reception, in which guests will be offered their choice of a flute of champagne or a shot of rye, depending on whether they think journalism is ready for a new baptism or last rites. So HOLD THAT DATE!  

    A couple of things Jim did not mention but that I wanted you to know as my special Just Wrought readers:

    • NewsWrights United has a Face Book page.  Go there by clicking http://www.facebook.com/NewsWrightsUnited  and then “like” us.  That’s one the quickest easiest ways to stay on top of our mercurial movements.
    • NewsWrights United has a twitter profile: “NewsWrights” Follow us.  (We have been, admittedly, Twitter-resistant in the past, but since half our stories involve the tool, and most actual journalists appear to be addicted to it, we figure we would look like idiots if we did not tweet.  (And possibly still look like idiots when we do.)

    Now rest assured, we’re going to be asking you for money to support this production.  And not just for the obvious reasons, like we like ourselves, think you will too, and need money to put on a show.  We also have some not so obvious reasons for asking for you support, such as:

    1. Every performance of our Living Newspapers is offered on a suggested donation basis.  We do this because we believe information and art should be as accessible as possible, and not just for those lucky few—and ever fewer—folks that can afford the enormous sum demanded for a theatre ticket these days.
    2. Journalism costs money.  To gather the news and to disseminate it.  NewsWrights United is no different, except we have actors and production designers and staff to pay to help display and distribute our news instead of printers and truck drivers.  We want you to participate directly in the financially supporting the journalism we provide, because such participation is the fair price of democracy.
    3. We are covering YOU!  We aren’t just staging Titus Andronicus or Glenngary Glen Ross because we want to, and  then making tortured arguments about how these plays are somehow relevant to your own stories today.  We are telling your own stories today!  We believe that ought to be worth something to you. 

    So here’s our hat.  You can start filling it by clicking on it.  It’ll take you to our Shunpike donation page.   

    Donation hat

    Early support is always deeply appreciated support.  So thanks.

    We have hit the ground.  We have spread out and chased down stories from sources all over this town and beyond.  We have begun to stitch them together into a script.  From this moment we will not stop until we give you the freshest, hardest-hitting local news-based theatre you have ever seen.

  • I’m Running Ads Now

    I have produced Just Wrought for about eight months now: a hugely fun, time-sucking, gut-wrenching adventure.  Honestly, I did not expect to make as many new friends as I have here in this short time.  What a delightfully unexpected added benefit to an endeavor for which I anticipated nothing in return except the satisfaction of finally saying publically what I was already telling any weary colleague willing to share a beer or coffee with me.  Recently, however, I was offered another unlooked-for opportunity for compensation, this one a bit more negotiable as legal tender.  Specifically, a company called TicketNetwork inquired about whether I would be willing to run a short text blurb in exchange for a monthly payment that was in the neighborhood of the combined costs of running the site.  I knee-jerked negatively at first: “What would ads say about my motivations for ranting?”  But when I really thought it through, I could not come up a single good reason not to run some advertising on the site so long as it:

    • Occupied a relatively small amount of space,
    • Did not come with any editorial quid pro quos attached, either explicitly or implicitly,
    • Was for a product or service generally inoffensive to myself or my readership as I understand them.

    On the other hand, I could rather easily see some reasons for running some revenue generating content:

    1. The site costs money: not much but some.  I already subsidize much of my artistic efforts with an unrelated day job.  If the blog can pay for itself–disregarding for now the still uncompensated time it takes me to create the content– then all the better.
    2. A company willing to pay to appear on the site means someone believes the site reaches people.  That is a belief I tend to want to share and reinforce.
    3. NewsWrights United is currently working on the second edition of A Living Newspaper.  (You can learn more about NewsWrights , and keep up to date on our doings by “liking” our FaceBook page, click here.)  This new edition, titled The New New News, will cover the current mega-crisis of journalism.  As a contributing playwright/reporter, one of my assigned beats is on-line monetization, i.e. how do the sites where we  get our news pay for themselves, or not?  Believing that one of the best ways to know a subject is to live it, I welcome this chance to try and monetize my own site, and understand the challenges from the inside.

    So, all of the above considered I decided to go ahead with this next step in my blogging adventures.  The ad appears in the right hand column under a heading called “Links.”

    Everything I do here at Just Wrought is to some degree an experiment in which I welcome your feedback, positive and negative.  This step is no different.  I really would like to hear your thoughts about my decision to run this modest advertisement.  And in the future, I trust you will keep me honest, letting me know if the ads become too numerous, distracting or inappropriate, or worse still, if it seems like they are skewing my message.

  • NewsWrights United begins “Crowd Sourcing” its Investigations

    NewsWrights United begins “Crowd Sourcing” its Investigations

    We posted the following note on the NewsWrights United Facebook page this morning, as we gear up our full-bore effort to cover the current crisis in journalism from a Pacific Northwest perspective. 

    Help NewsWrights “Crowd Source” its Investigation into How Northwest On-Line Newsies Monetize

    As Newswrights United continues its investigation into the current crisis of journalism for our upcoming second edition of A Living Newspaper: The New New News, it has become clear to us that monetization is possibly the most crucial issue facing the imperiled Fourth Estate. How will these nascent on-line information sources sustain themselves financially? Will the reporters gathering the news be able to make a living or will they, like, say theatre artists, be forced to cobble together their livelihoods through means both related and unrelated to their chosen vocation of truth telling? Will funders, advertisers, subscribers and other potential sources of revenue respect the traditional “fire-wall” between financial and editorial?

    Our Editing Producer Tom Paulson shrewdly notes that the “monetization question” is one most journalists are unwilling to ask, since they would rather not to have to answer it themselves. We at NewsWrights believe a significant public service could be performed simply by accurately reporting how Seattle’s online news providers fund their operations and how they plan to in the future. After all, since we are only playacting as journalists, we should have nothing to lose, right?

    So if you know anything, or know anyone that might know anything, about how the sites on the following list are monetizing, please let us know.

    CrossCut

    InvestigateWest

    MyBallard.com (along with its other neighborhood affiliates: MyQueenAnne, etc.)

    PI.com

    Publicola

    Seattle Times on line

    Seattlecrime.com

    Seattlepostglobe.org

    The Stranger on line (SLOG)

    Sunbreak.com

    Weekly online

    West Seattle Blog

    (Please feel free to suggest additions to this list.)

    You can go to the NewsWrights United Facebook page by clicking here.

    If you have not already done so, I strongly encourage you to “like” us on Facebook.  We will not be spamming you, but rather encouraging you to chime in as we build our theatrical coverage of The New New News, ultimately culminating in a production of a second edition of A Living Newspaper in Seattle early next year. 

  • The Seattle Rep and the Fifth Avenue Take a Walk on the Sleazy Side

    I will be honest: although I always hope for the best, I never really expected the Big Houses here in Seattle to have some sort of Road-to-Damascus conversion and start doing the right thing. I always assumed they would continue to offer safe and staid programming and promote it with safe and staid marketing techniques.  So when I read in this week’s Stranger that the Fifth Avenue was paying for coverage on KING 5 TV’S New Day Northwest without making it plain that the coverage was sponsored, I was actually genuinely shocked.  And I have to confess, it gave me a bit of pleasure, because I honestly did not think that, given their tepid programming, the Big Houses could ever possibly shock me again.

    Folks, this story will get spun by the culpable spinners.  Those of us who are appalled by this supremely less than ethical behavior will be branded as naïve and bitter; but this is exactly the sort of thing the Bush Administration tried to pull. 

    …the White House, … spent taxpayer money to produce local TV-news segments advocating policies of the Bush administration. The Government Accountability Office condemned these paid-for “news” segments as “covert propaganda,” but the White House instructed agencies to ignore the GAO findings.

    “As a former journalist, I’m horrified to be compared with the Bush administration,” Larson said. “This isn’t a news program—it’s an entertainment program.”

    If the Rep and the Fifth cannot see what they did was wrong, then they have no business offering us art that purports to be honest, edgy, and untainted by corporate equivocation.

    ***

    PS:  Brendan Kiley suggests here that all the Big Houses, plus the little ones like WET, too,  owe him back pay for covering them, but I would further suggest that NewsWrights United covered the Seattle theatre press in last fall’s It’s Not in the P-I: A Living Newspaper about a Dying Newspaper, so perhaps they in turn owe us a little som’n-som’n.  Granted, I wrote about Misha Berson and Joe Adcock. (You can watch the video here. ) and left out  Kiley, because, let’s face it, he’s just too boring.  But Brendan?  If you’re willing to make me an offer I’ll happily write a play about how you wrote an article about how the Fifth bought buzz and convinced the Rep to join their ethically dubious enterprise, for what I can only imagine was what they saw as the high-ground cover the Rep could offer them if the shit hit (which it did).  Forget cover, Big Houses.  Your cover is blown.  Get started living right, or get started dying.  There are no longer any in-betweens.

    PPS:  A year and a half a go The Stranger gave me a hunk of change for being a “Genius”.  Obviously, this is a bogus award, the sole purpose of which was to get me to push traffic over to their website.  So go, damn you, go!  I don’t want them asking for their money back!

    PPPS:  I hate loving The Stranger, but given the connect-the-dots drawing of Mohammad they ran on the front of this issue, how can I help my damned self.

  • Misha Versus Joe

    It is a long-standing fantasy among show people to perpetrate a “turn-about” and review the reviewers, but really, if want to do what you do best, stay at your own level and not sink to mere criticism, the proper “turn-about” for stage folk is to stage the critics.  That is exactly what we did here.

    Misha vs Joe from NewsWrights United on Vimeo.

    Misha Berson, Theatre Critic for The Seattle Times was not happy with this portrayal and made her displeasure clearly known to all of the producers including myself.  Others, especially ex-staffers for The Seattle Post-Intelligencer complained about how we savaged their former colleague, Joe Adcock; but I completely disagree with this appraisal and I suspect Joe might too.  For me the piece lands clearly on a final note of love.  The genuine pain I felt upon Joe’s departure was not shared by many in my community, but I have to hope this is because they did not know him very well, or care to. One Big House artistic director reportedly remarked on learning of Joe’s retirement: “Ding dong, the witch is dead!” I suspect that same AD will feel the same when/if I finally leave town, dead or alive.  I say, be careful when casting anyone as the witch: for all you know, many may picture you surrounded by ugly flying monkeys. For my part, I want to dance with the Big House witches, not wish them dead. I wish my dear witches would wake up. And I am determined to do everything it takes to make that happen. 

    I have seen how theatre gets covered in other towns Seattle’s size. I am glad we have Misha and Brendan Kiley and all the others. In the current crisis of journalism, every critic we lose is an irrevocable loss. Alas, I suspect Misha does not feel the same about me. After all, playwrights are a dime a dozen, and happily we do not depend on the survival of any one institution. Formidable is the power of nothing to lose. At this ripe moment in the history of our art form, I wouldn’t trade it for anything.