Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Tag: Dan Savage

  • Sincerely, Good Luck

    Sincerely, Good Luck

    Of course I believe in free will.  I have no choice.
    Isaac Bashevis Singer

    Imagine that I am essentially cynical and selfish. Imagine that what a friend of mine who works at one of Seattle Big Houses once told me is true: that the only reason I write this blog is because I’m mad that they won’t produce my plays.  Imagine that my outrage has always been, and will always be, essentially self-serving.  Come on.  Imagine.  Like the man says, it’s easy if you try.

    It would explain a lot actually, like why nearly a year ago I felt safe saying in a post titled “On Institutional Arrogance”:

    Allow me to honor the clarity of Intiman’s ultimatum with some clarity of my own: I hope they die.   I hope they do it soon and with a minimum of suffering.  And most of all I hope they do it without siphoning precious funds from the rest of us who make theatre in the Pacific Northwest.

    It didn’t take a psychic to know that , despite then Artistic Director, Kate Whoriskey’s guilt-trippy pandering plea, they were highly unlikely to raise the half a million dollars they were asking for in what I called their “shoot-the-puppy” campaign.  So I bet the safe money and called for them to close their doors.  Cynical.  Self-serving.  And ultimately dead accurate.

    Similarly but conversely, when the Intiman announced last August that they would keeping Andrew Russell on as “consulting artistic director” and that his goal for 2012 would be “….to establish a loose collective of playwrights, directors, actors, designers and others to devise projects for Intiman to produce, in a short “micro-season” mounted next summer…” I kept my mouth shut.  Here was a situation not so easy for a self-serving cynic to prognosticate. 

    Then in November Russell made his plans plainer.  This from The Stranger’s Slog:

    At a press conference earlier today, Intiman announced it was going to make a go of it after all, with a four-play summer festival, a repertory company of 12 actors, and artistic direction from Andrew Russell. The four-play season is a “split focus,” as Russell put it, between Intiman regulars and a potential new crowd that wants to see newer, weirder, more local work.

    Reading further down I learned that Russell had recruited for his bold new strategy some of Seattle’s most exciting (and mostly young) talents like Marya Sea Kaminski, Michael Place, and Jennifer Zeyl; topping it off by somehow snagging the venerable Dan Savage to provide the original work for Russell’s four play plan.  This was no longer a “shoot-the-puppy” campaign.  This was a “Honey-look-at–this-adorable-puppy-I-brought–home-for-Christmas!” campaign.  And a very sexy puppy at that.  When you’ve been as cynical and self-serving as I have, for as long as I have, you learn not to bet against this kind of talent.  I kept my mouth shut again and waited to see if the “phoenix Intiman” could raise the million they were now asking for.  I suspected they would.

    And late last night we found out they did.

    I have met Andrew Russell.  He was gracious enough to come hear an early reading of my new play Ballard House Duet.  Along with a handful of other trusted colleagues, he gave some truly insightful feedback.  It’s clear to me that Andrew is extraordinarily talented at motivating people and, more importantly, money.  In the world of 21st Century regional theatre, you really cannot ask for more of an artistic director.  And Andrew has a few other things going for him.  He’s young.  He’s ambitious, and unlike his predecessor Kate Whoriskey, he owes his position not to sinecure but his own pluck and determination.  In short, he earned it.  What’s more, he’s making deep connections with the amazing talent native to Seattle.  All this bodes well for the success of his career, if not necessarily for the sustained success of Intiman.  But then again, I think I have been clear in the past how much I care whether the institution we formerly knew as the Intiman lives or dies.  Instead I say, long live the talent represented in the team Andrew has assembled, and long live his own talent for recognizing and organizing it.

    And if, as I cynically suspect, Andrew ultimately winds up on the same path as a few promising rookie Mariners, eventually proving himself worthy of a trade to the Yankees in a few years, well then, I may grumble and bitch, but I will still watch in quiet admiration when he belts one over the bleachers in New York.

  • Why is Theatre Puget Sound Diluting its Mission?

    Why is Theatre Puget Sound Diluting its Mission?

    Yes, we all cringed when we saw the Theatre Puget Sound (TPS) ads for Theatre Week in years past.   Apparently some PR firm had been hired in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and given the very specific instructions to create a campaign that would confirm every uninitiated civilian’s suspicion about just how lame and goofy live theatre can be.  Bowler hats, canes and dorky “del arte” facial expressions were de rigueur.  Some one who did not know better could easily have gotten the impression that every show in Seattle was some variation of a Godspell Hell.

    The comments to Dan Savage’s Slog post here about this flip phone pic  below sum up the general response hilariously.  Comment number 5 buttons them all together, thusly: “Perhaps it is a typo… perhaps it is supposed to read “Live Theatre Weak”

    Screen shot from Slog

    If you are tempted to riposte in the comments with that hoary Seattle arts chestnut of an excuse: “They were doing the best they could”, please spare us, because anyone looking to encapsulate the thrill of theatre photographically need look no further for examples than any of the images pushed out over the last few years by WET. (Sorry, I just can’t bring myself to cave and call them “Washington Ensemble Theatre” just because some litigious trust-funded ensemble in NYC got jealous of WET’s success.  See here .)

    Promotional photo from WET's Hedda Gabbler redux: blahblahblahBANG Promotional photo for WET's Titus Androncius

    Promotional photo for WET's RoboPop

    (Just how and why is it that WET can make headphones so sexy?)

    As much as Seattle’s theatre professionals longed for a fresh and empowering marketing campaign from TPS to hook people into big and small local theaters around town, the last kind of change most of us would have wished for is what rolled out this Spring.

    Announcing Arts Crush,
    The Month-Long Arts Festival

    on April 19, 2010, at 5:30 pm | Category: Arts Crush

    As you may already know, Theatre Puget Sound is planning an expansion of our highly successful Live Theatre Week festival.  In an effort to build upon the momentum of that program and address the expressed needs of the larger arts community, we decided to expand our scope and build a more diverse and inclusive month-long festival modeled after Live Theatre Week.

    This October, Theatre Puget Sound will present Arts Crush, a month-long festival that connects artists and audiences with invigorating new experiences at hundreds of events across the region.  More than 200 arts organizations and innumerable artists from all over the Puget Sound will come together as a united arts community to share arts experiences with people of all kinds….

    So Theatre Week becomes Arts Crush, and somehow, the theatre artists (mostly actors, actually) that make up TPS’s membership, all of the sudden become, without being asked, patrons of all the arts, because, you know, we make so much money on the stage.  Where are the other major discipline-specific arts organizations that are joining TPS in this move towards expansiveness?  There are none.  TPS basically owns Arts Crush, in conjunction with broad based arts funders like Seattle Office of Arts & Cultural Affairs.  None of the non-theatre-but-still-discipline-specific organizations like Velocity Dance or Seattle Chamber Music come even close to matching TPS’s size or influence.

    Before I go on, let’s take a quick look at TPS’s mission, shall we?

    TPS is a member-driven organization whose main goals are the nurturing of a healthy and vibrant theatre community, developing strong ties among the region’s theatre professionals, raising the visibility of the region’s theatre scene on national and international levels, and finding ways to develop new and diverse audiences.

    Nowhere in the paragraph above is there any mention of cross-discipline arts promotion.

    So why is TPS diluting its mission?  My best guess is fear, with a touch of pointless power grab thrown in for flavor.  The move is part of a larger strategy to beat a tasteful and bloodless retreat from world class status.  The thinking goes like this, “Theatre is suffering.  And so are all the arts.  The core audience for theatre in the Northwest overlaps the core audiences for all of the other arts.  Let’s expand our scope, control that shrinking core and hope to hold the ground we have.  We can give up the castle to control the wider, albeit weakened, kingdom.”

    Of course this runs counter to what I and many of my colleagues believe is the best strategy to not only save theatre in Seattle but also elevate it to world class status at the same time.  We believe now is the time go on the offensive: to advance, not retreat; to push forward bold new and innovative plans for making a completely different and fresh sort of theatre.  We certainly do not think we should be spending our limited resources promoting “arts” in general.  That sort of “yay arts!”, “up with people!” advocacy ultimately helps no one.

    TPS’s desperation is showing.  Just this week an email went out from extending the deadline for applications to the Arts Crush festival.  A cynic has to wonder why.  Could the dilution of the TPS’s core mission have anything to do with it? <
    /p>

    Turning Theatre Week into Arts Crush is a mistake.  Theatre artists are rightfully reluctant to underwrite an effort that has expunged the word “theatre” from its name.  (If you played professional shortstop in Seattle, and the Mariners began a promotional campaign promoting all sports, but omitting the word “baseball” from its title, would you be worried, irritated or both?)  TPS should rethink this move.  Seattle needs a theatre advocacy organization that can keep its focus.  If TPS wants to be something other than it is, they should be honest about it and change their moniker to “APS” for Arts Puget Sound.  Of course, if they did that you would have to wonder what it would do to their membership rolls.