Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Category: Seattle

  • The New Posters are Here! The New Posters are Here!

    The New Posters are Here! The New Posters are Here!

    Could I be more excited?!

    The new posters are in for The New New News: A Living Newspaper, and NewsWrights United’s magnificent Managing Producer, Jim Jewell, will be handing them off to Keep Posted for delivery around the Puget Sound. Soon you’ll be seeing one on the wall of your favorite tragically hip coffee shop!

    Could I be more pleased!? 

    No, I don’t think I could.

    (Haven’t been so happy about a poster since this.)

    For more information on the show, and how to order reservations in advance, click here.

  • Extra! Extra! The New New News to Drop at a Seattle Doorstep Near You!

    Extra! Extra! The New New News to Drop at a Seattle Doorstep Near You!

    It’s official.  We have the dates and we are rolling out the press release to local and national media as I post this.  The second edition of NewsWrights United’s Living Newspaper: The New New News will be delivered at three—count ‘em, THREE!—theatrical doorsteps throughout Seattle: North, South and Central.  I am enclosing the release, authored by our magnificent Managing Producer, Jim Jewell, so that you can have all the coveted details:

    *****

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    January 13, 2011

    Media Contact:  Jim Jewell, Managing Producer
    jim@newswrightsunited.org
    206.359.1738

    NewsWrights United presents…
    The New New News:
    A Living Newspaper about
    Journalism in the Age of New Media

    SEATTLE, WA – NewsWrights United will be delivering the next edition of their Living Newspaper to neighborhoods throughout Seattle this spring with The New New News: A Living Newspaper, opening February 18, 2011 at Olympic Theatre at South Seattle Community College (SSCC). The New New News will remain at Olympic Theatre through February 20, 2011 before moving to Erickson Theatre on Capitol Hill February 24-27, 2011 and finally to Stage One Theatre at North Seattle Community College (NSCC) March 2-13, 2011.

          The New New News: A Living Newspaper was written by NewsWrights Executive Producer Paul Mullin and Creative Producer Dawson Nichols, in collaboration with Editing Producer Tom Paulson, and will be directed by Nichols.

          The New New News: A Living Newspaper examines journalism in the age of new media, paying special attention to the implications to information and democracy created by the collapse of newspapers, the 24-hour news cycle and the demands of monetizing media. The play follows the staff of The New New News, an online news provider dedicated to coverage of online news, after their primary financier has given them just 12 hours to double website traffic or be shut down. Coverage of the Maurice Clemmons manhunt and The Seattle Times’ subsequent Pulitzer win, NW sports-writing legend Art Thiel’s efforts to launch and monetize his own sports site, hyper-local political bloggers, live-and-mobile streaming and the ascendance of Twitter underscore The New New News crews’ efforts to create immediate and compelling news. The New New News examines the choices journalists make when their livelihood is on the line and success is measured by the eyeball and the minute.

          This is the second Living Newspaper produced by NewsWrights United, serving a similar function as the first while breaking new ground. “It’s Not In The P-I was about the death of a newspaper,” says Nichols. “The New New News is about journalism in the new media environment – who produces it, who consumes it, how it is different from the journalism we have known.  Like the first play, this one is local and timely, addressing these issues through stories and people that are rooted in Seattle.”

          These are familiar themes for NewsWrights, as they view part of their mission as the revitalization of both theatre and journalism, and localism as a key to success. Jokes Mullin, “Immediacy comes in two basic flavors: one of time and one of space.  When you bring journalism into a theatre, you bring the two different flavors together for an explosively tasty combination!  It’s better than peanut butter and jelly.”

          This newest Living Newspaper will once again be produced in cooperation with NSCC’s theatre program (which is led by NewsWrights’ producer Nichols), and will bring together professional actors with NSCC students. The professional cast includes Michelle Chiachiere, Mark Fullerton, Joe Ivy, Catherine Kettrick, Joe McCarthy and Jordan Williamson. Dan Schuy from NSCC serves as Technical Director, Lighting Designer and Set Designer.

        The full performance schedule for The New New News: A Living Newspaper is as follows:

    Olympic Theatre at South Seattle Community College (SSCC)
    6000 16th Ave. SW, Seattle, 98106
    Friday February 18 and Saturday February 19 @ 7:30pm
    Sunday February 20 @ 2pm
    https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/148545

    The Erickson Theatre on Capitol Hill (part of Seattle Central Community College)
    1524 Harvard Ave, Seattle, 98122
    Thursday February 24, Friday February 25 and Saturday February 26 @ 7:30pm
    Sunday February 27 @ 2pm

    https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/148614

    Stage One Theatre at North Seattle Community College (NSCC)
    9600 College Way North, Seattle, 98103
    Wednesday March 2 at Noon
    Friday March 4, Saturday March 5, Friday March 11 & Saturday March 12 @ 7:30pm
    Sunday March 6 and Sunday March 13 @ 2pm

    https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/148619

    All performances Pay What You Will. Advance reservations available at Brown Paper Tickets for each performance venue as listed above.
         

    NewsWrights United would like to thank 4Culture, Vulcan, Shunpike and their many individual donors for supporting The New New News and other programs of NewsWrights United.

    ###

    About NewsWrights United
    NewsWrights United
    was founded in 2009 by playwrights Paul Mullin and Dawson Nichols and former P-I reporter Tom Paulson to produce It’s Not in the P-I: A Living Newspaper About a Dying Newspaper. Managing Producer Jim Jewell and Dramaturg Wes Andrews joined the team in summer 2010. NewsWrights United’s mission is to produce and advance the form of the Living Newspaper – local, topical stories pursued with journalistic rigor and presented through the medium of live theatre.

    About Shunpike
    Shunpike is a 501(c)(3) non-profit art service organization whose mission is to strengthen the Seattle arts community by partnering with small and mid-size arts groups to develop the business tools they need to succeed. Working in close partnership with these groups, Shunpike helps solve problems quickly and impart vital skills in finance, organizational management and arts administration.

  • The Macallan Talks – Side Two

    The Macallan Talks – Side Two

    A few days ago I shared a transcript I recently found from the first half of a cassette tape recording that William Salyers and I made one evening in 1997 while consuming a bottle of Macallan scotch, each.  As promised, I share the second half of the full transcript at the end of this post.

    We are clearly getting drunker on side two.  Alas, this does not increase the insightfulness of our comments.  Just the opposite, I’m afraid.  I sure don’t like myself very much as the discussion wears on.  It feels to me, thirteen years later, like I am trying to badger Bill into believing he will be a better artist once he admits he’s an artist and opens himself up to– what?—the “wider universe”; the “heroism of art”, or whatever woo-woo crap 30-year old-Paul was spouting.  At one point, I literally say to him: “I think you need to start reading folktales.”  Can you even get more excruciatingly Left-Coast Joseph Campbellish condescending than that? 

    In the intervening time since I gave him this advice Bill Salyers has gone on to world premiere the title role in Louis Slotin Sonata  in Los Angeles and then off-Broadway, winning himself several awards and enormous critical acclaim for his efforts.  He also world-premiered my play An American Book Of The Dead – The Game Show, directed the world premiere of The Good Ship Manhattan, world premiered The Sequence playing future Nobel Laureate, Francis Collins, and these are just the examples from my scripts. The quality of his work as an actor in an even broader panoply of plays —classic, modern or brand new (mine and others) — is legend.  And I think it is safe to say that Bill never really changed his point of view from the one he espouses in these recordings.  In other words, for all my high holy exhortation to become a better artist by first admitting he is one, Bill remained a great artist, and became an even greater one, simply by being Bill.  Lesson learned: not all heroes and artists want to be heroes and artists— some don’t even believe in such things— and yet, somehow, art and heroism still happen.

    So, with that, here’s some highlights, then the whole thing at the end if you’re interested:

    Blowing smoke up Salyers’ shorts while simultaneously patronizing him

    PAUL:  I consider you to be as great an artist as I’ve ever met.  I consider you… to…I consider that I need to learn things about my craft that you’ve already learned about yours.  I’ve also– yeah!  And I’m starting to, because you’ve worked at your craft.  You’ve been pragmatic hands-on with your craft in a lot of different ways that I’m just starting to: I’m starting to write for television, you know.  I’m starting to… write for hire.

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  You know?

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  Which you’ve been doing for a while.  In fact, in some ways, you… that’s what you do is act for hire…. Except on projects like TUESDAY where you chose to do it because of– of whatever feelings you have for the work.  Um… but I– but I think the one thing that I’ve always kind of instinctively known, whether it was because of my religions upbringing, or because of my attraction to art.

    BILL:  Mm-hm

    PAUL:  Because my attraction to art was one of a knight in shining armor.  And we can talk about that too.  Uh…I have revised my vision– but not completely on that.  Um… I do think that artists are true heroes.

    BILL:  Hmm?  (Maybe this is sort of a verbal shrug?)

    PAUL:  True heroes.  That true artists are those people who um…. and I include that person who can make the exquisite phad tai, or… or the exquisite scotch, or, or can uh… well, we can talk about that maybe later, but– I feel like one of the things that– that you refuse to admit is that that which you do is beyond your control–

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  To a certain extent.  And you’re uncomfortable with that.

    Devolving into faux-Jesse Jacksonism

    PAUL:  For many people– for the born-again Christians of the world– I would nothing but heartily convince them that there is nothing outside themselves.

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  That that world which they have created is their own fucking fucked-up… vision of the world.

    BILL:  Yeah.

    PAUL:  And that that which they hate is themselves.  And that which they love is a… sweetened aspect of themselves and that they have not left themselves.

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  You… you I would encourage you to see the other aspect of the universe, and that is that you are constantly connected in a thousand million different ways to that which you feel unconnected to.  And that that the– that the satellite– you’re either a satellite revolving around the sun or you are the revolution.  You know?

    BILL:  Mmm.

    PAUL:  You know?

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  And uh… not to sound like Jesse Jackson.   Although that would be– Fuck, man.  I should write for Jesse Jackson ‘cuz that’s great!

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  That’s better than anything Jesse’s said in a long mother-fucking time. 

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  You’re either that which revolves around the sun, or (Jesse Voice) you are the revolution!

    BILL:  You’re right.  That does sound like Jesse.

    PAUL:  Umm.  Except it doesn’t rhyme.  But it’s– it’s a little too sublime for Jesse.  We’ll have to find some other demagogue for it.  But– although I love– my heart goes out to Jesse.  I can’t hate, Jesse.  He’s fab–  Did you hear his speech the last convention?  It rocked.

    Mullin lays an Irish curse on Salyers

    PAUL:  There’s– There’s this great Zen koan that I love.  Says– the young monk comes to the master, and says, you know, “I’m meditating but I’m too cold.”  And the Zen master says, “Well, you know when cold go to that place where you are so cold that it kills you and when you are hot go to that place where you are so hot that it kills you.”  And I lay this Irish curse on you: “Live in that universe where there is no art.  Be that universe where there is no art.”

    BILL:  Well, I think I’ve tried to.  I mean, I–

    PAUL:  No, I mean it.

    (Paul laughs.)

    PAUL:  NO, I MEAN IT!

    (Paul laughs hysterically.)

    BILL (drunken voice mockery of Paul):  You don’t understand!

    On whether an actor should ever argue a director down

    BILL:  This stuff about– this stuff about uh– nobody stops to think about the fact that there was a director involved in that show.  It wasn’t just about what Steven wrote.  It wasn’t just about what I did, you know?  What I– when I’m– when I’m rending my hair, my fake hair, at an incredible point and I go, “RENFIELD!”  That’s not necessarily my choice.

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  That’s me doing what I was told the best way I could.  And I’m–

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  And I’m presented with the challenge of trying to find truth in that.  Now a lot of actors would have argued Eddie down….  That’s not my job.  It’s not my– it’s not my job to uh– promote myself–

    PAUL:  Is there ever a time when it’s right to argue a director down?

    BILL:  Yeah, when you’re the other director. 

    (Paul begins to groan very lowly. )

    BILL:  If you’re an actor your job is to do what you’re told as best as you possibly can.

    PAUL:  Wow!  Okay!  We come to the truth of it.

    BILL:  I’ve– I’ve long said that.  If you want to direct a play go fucking direct a play.

    PAUL:  Well, wait a second.  Wa-wa-wa-waaaiiit a second

    BILL:  Okay.

    PAUL:  Because I think it’s not as facile as that.

    BILL:  I think it should be.  I think if you’re a craftsman it is.

    PAUL:  Ah well.

    BILL:  –And that’s why I’m not an artist.

    PAUL:  Hmmm.

    BILL:  I– I don’t have any patience for that crap.  I mean, it’s another– it’s another– it’s another way that the film world has invaded what we do.

    PAUL (overlapping):  Well, here we go.  Well, here we go is what I’m saying is like, yes, as the novice, rookie, bullshit actor who’s got a little taste of Stanislavsky, a bad taste via Mr. Uh– Strasberg.

    BILL:  Strasberg, yeah.

    PAUL:  Uh….  That’s the last thing they need to be doing is telling the director what their choices are.  But let me tell you something about Mr. (slurry) Mr. Eddie Levi Lee, is that you know more about theatre in your fucking, you know, nose–

    BILL:  Then I, then I–

    PAUL:  Hair clippings than Eddie Levi Lee knows.

    BILL:  Okay, then if I– if I believe that going into it, I’m a hypocrite when I sign the contract.  And I’m not a hypocrite… so I sign the contract.

    PAUL:  I–  augh!

    On whether an actor should ever refuse a line change from a director

    PAUL:  Billy, you’re saying– you’re saying to me that in no circumstances would it be right for you as one of the best actors that I know uh… to– to call bullshit on a director.  That

    BILL:  I’m saying it’s not my job.

    PAUL (overlapping):  That fucking frightens me.  No, it is your fucking job!

    BILL:  No, it’s not.

    PAUL:  Yes, it is your fucking jo–

    BILL:  I don’t agree with you.

    PAUL (overlapping):  I went to– John Sylvain came to me and said– I had a line that said, “I threw that pass–”  now obviously this is an actor/playwright, a whole ‘nother issue.

    BILL:  I know the line you’re talking about, too.

    PAUL:  Yeah, said, “That fucking nigger dropped it.”

    BILL (simultaneously):  “That fucking nigger dropped it.”

    PAUL:  And Johnny said, “You need to cut that.”  And I said, “You need to go fuck yourself, because one, it’s the night before opening, and two, it’s the fucking script, and THREE, it’s the way we rehearsed it.

    BILL:  Well, let me– let me tell you something.  I’m not saying– don’t misunderstand me.  In that same situation I would have asked John to keep the line.  I wouldn’t have told John to go fuck himself, because John’s the director.

    PAUL:  No!  No!  No!.  But see that’s where I digress with you, because John’s fucking with my shit there and he has no business doing it.

    BILL:  Brother, it’s not–

    PAUL:  And he deserves–

    BILL:  It isn’t your shit!

    PAUL:  Yes!

    BILL:  It’s our shit.

    To follow is the full transcript of the second side of the cassette.

    (more…)

  • The Macallan Talks – Side One

    The Macallan Talks – Side One

    Giving my demons the year off  has left me time to take care of some housecleaning, like backing up my old files to the cloud before my next hard drive crashes.  About a week ago I ran across a couple of old Word files that I thought were lost forever: transcripts from something called “the Macallan Talks”.  The premise was simple: two full fifths of Macallan 12-year-old scotch, a cassette tape recorder, William Salyers and myself.  We would talk about what we always talked about, but capture it on tape finally so that I could transcribe it and then possibly either publish or stage it.  Or at least that’s what I recall the plan was.  This was over thirteen years ago, so I’m not really sure what I was thinking.  All I know is that this conversation has never seen the light of day until now.

    Mostly you get an ardent exchange between two friends who love talking, especially to each other.  Bill and I still blather like this, whether on the phone, since we no longer live in the city, or into the wee hours over scotch and illicit cigarettes, on the now ever rarer occasions when we do manage to get together in person.  What strikes me most clearly now looking over these transcripts is how little our positions have changed in the intervening years. Bill still ardently defends his “craft” against any woo-woo incursions of higher powers or purposes.  I still maintain that what we do, when we do it well, matters in sublime and fundamental ways we can only barely glimpse in fleeting, incomplete flashes.

    Had I made these discussions public at the time, I am convinced that they would have been dismissed as the pompous rantings of a pair of third-tier theatre artists who thought way too highly of themselves and each other.  Now?  Well, nothing’s changed.  All of that is essentially still true (sorry Bill, at least you have a television career), but somehow I imagine (hope?) that the intervening near decade and a half gives our arguments some resonance beyond the moment.  Of course, the final analysis is up to you.  I publish the full first cassette side transcript at the end of this post.  I will publish the second side in another upcoming post.  In the meantime, some highlights from the first half:

    On lying and acting . . .

    (I try to start the tape without Bill knowing but he can tell something’s different about my face.  I’m a horrible liar…. )

    PAUL:   So let’s talk about lying.  Is a good actor a liar or not a liar.

    BILL:  Well you know what Plato thought about that?

    PAUL:  What?

    BILL:  He literally thought–

    PAUL:  Micky Mouse’s dog?

        (beat)

    BILL:  I was about to imitate him and then I realized I couldn’t. 

        (He laughs.)

        ‘Cause he doesn’t–

    BILL & PAUL (together):  Say anything!

    . . . .

    BILL:  From what I remember reading in college, Plato said that actors should be killed because they lie.

    PAUL:  See I consider myself a pretty good actor and I cannot lie to save my life.

    BILL:  Well, I can lie but I consider them to be two separate things.  I don’t… I don’t lie unless I absolutely have to, and I hold that to a pretty high standard.  It’s not about my convenience.  I’ll take a lot of shit before I’ll tell a lie.  Because of that thing we were talking about.  About how it’s an allowance.  How responsibility comes with the power.

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  And the only way I can tell a lie is to buy into myself.

    PAUL:  Yeah, so you involve yourself in the Dark magic.

    On art versus craft . . .

    BILL:  . . . I think the word “art” is pretty useless.  It is so subjective as to be pointless–

    PAUL:  Like “love” or something like that?

    BILL:  Exactly.

    PAUL:  Well, what would you replace it with?  Or would you?

    BILL:  I’m not sure that you need the word.  It’s almost used to describe that which people don’t have the capacity to describe another way.  When someone says “art” they’re either collectors talking about something that’s worth a lot of money, or they are people who are moved beyond the ability to express… that.

    PAUL:  What about when somebody says, “The way that guy does phad thai is a frickin’ art?”

    BILL:  he’s talking about a transcendent experience     that goes beyond what he understands as being the execution of… the act.

    PAUL:  Well, what about that?  Is there something to that?  I mean this “transcendent experience”– if we don’t have a name for it beyond “art” shall we not call it that?

    BILL:  I think it’s the height of craft.  When I approach a role there are a whole lot of givens.  I think particularly in acting, and particular among young actors, there’s a need to over romanticize what we do.

    PAUL:  Well, yeah… and then you get into that nastiness of Method and that whole “I-must-go-through-that-which-my-character-has-go-through” nonsense.

    BILL:  Yes.  That’s right.  And actors saying things like– in all seriousness– “I don’t like to like to take about the craft ’cause I don’t like to over analyze it.  And if I over analyze it, I’ll kill it.”

    PAUL:  Which– yeah– sounds like somebody who…

    BILL:  Doesn’t know what the fuck they’re doing.  that’s exactly right.

    On going the dangers and responsibilities of playing a dark role

    PAUL:  … Ok, I’m gonna go on the record about TUESDAY.  I think that the reason why TUESDAY was hard was because you had met the wall with your “craft”, and with TUESDAY you had to be an artist.  And you were an artist, but it hurt because you were entering a realm where– to use those fantastic mytho-terms– you entered the realm where you were naked and raw.  It’s like the total hero’s journey.  At the beginning we see the hero and he’s kick-ass, but he finally meets the challenge that is capable of kicking his ass.  And then it becomes interesting.  That’s where the heart becomes involved.  And that’s why I argue this art-versus-craft argument over and over again.  And that’s why I’d like to try and get to the meat of it.

    BILL:  So you’re a masochist, because art has to hurt.

    PAUL:  No…   No…  It’s an old Buddhist thing.  You see Westerners misunderstand Buddhism because they think it’s nihilism.  Because they say, “Well what a Zen Buddhist does is he sits in a room for eight hours, and that’s torture!”

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  And it is torture, and I do kinda share the opinion that the people that are attracted to Zen are masochists, but I do it, and I’ve sat in a room for 8 hours and I’ll probably do it again.  See the problem is most Westerners misinterpret Buddhism as saying “You must suffer.”  And I would interpret it slightly differently.  I would say true Buddhism is: “You will suffer.”  But ultimately the suffering is as unimportant, if not more unimportant than the pleasure.

    BILL:  So you don’t glorify the suffering.

    PAUL:  No.  Not all.  The suffering is a message.  And there’s something to be said for computer metaphors– the suffering is like an error message, saying, “Ok, error in sector B.  You’re suffering.  Why?  Why are you hurting?”  Like, why does it hurt to do TUESDAY?…  And you’re looking for reasons like your technique wasn’t quite right,  and I’m saying no.  You’re doing everything right.  You just refuse to admit that that which you are doing is more important than you think it is.  And that that which you are doing is more connected and more vital and more rooted in who you are than you feel comfortable with as a craftsman.

    BILL:  Well my reaction to that is first of all is that… if we go that way for a moment, if we accept that as a truism, I have absolutely no problem in saying I’m not interested in that.  I’m not interested in self-flagellation in public.  That has no–

    PAUL:  Well, first off that’s not what I’m talking about.  And second off, if you were to say that to a Zen master, he’d probably give you a whack on the head, but then he’d say, “Who cares what you’re interested in?”  No one cares what you’re interested in.

    BILL:  But remember I act for selfish reasons.

    PAUL:  Well, maybe it’s time to wake up. . . .

    To follow is the full transcript of the first side of the cassette. 

    (more…)

  • NewsWrights Reads WikiLeaks

    NewsWrights Reads WikiLeaks

    If this be treason, make the most of it!
    Patrick Henry

    A couple weeks ago— though it seems like half a year in this hyper-speed news cycle that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have helped spin even faster— incoming Tea Party Congressman, Allen West stated publically that he not only considered Assange’s decision to leak classified State Department cables to be an act of treason, but equally treasonous the  further dissemination of  the leaks by any news agency in the country.  He baldly called for American news outlets to be censored for running stories based on the WikiLeaks’ cable dump.  [Read more here.]  Then later Allen back-tracked and said, “I didn’t say ‘censored.’  I said ‘censured.’”

    Last Sunday evening, while the Seahawks staggered to their NFC West Championship win, NewsWrights United’s Wes Andrews led five other theatre artists: Jose Amador, Llysa Holland, Spike Friedman, Ramon Esquivel and Josh Parks, in publically reading excerpts of the leaked cables at Annex Theatre in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood.  Personally, I was proud to be in the audience participating at least vicariously in what the blow-hard Tea Bagging demagogic moron, Allen West, considers sedition.

    The excerpts the actors chose to share originated from consulates spanning the globe from Venezuela to Iran, and included both inspiring stories of personal heroism to gossip about absurdly profligate parties thrown by quasi-governmental gangsters in the Caucasus [see here].  Perhaps the most striking feature of these communiqués is the remarkably consistent quality of writing: far better, far more cleanly evocative than most of what passes for journalism these days.  Apparently the authors, diplomats spread across the globe, all consider themselves members of a secret elite club who compete to impress each other with their wry yarns spun from foreign adventure.

    While the events described vary widely, one theme came clearly through each of the cables read Sunday night.  People in other countries care deeply about the United States of America.  No, they don’t love us, perhaps don’t even respect us.  But they care what we do and what we think.  A lot.  And those of them that hate and/or fear us don’t do so because of our aggression and our imperialism.  These crass aspects of Americanism are the ones they actually understand and abide, and even hope to emulate.  No, it is our blithe and breezy free-thinking, our defiance of authority, our belief in the individual and his or her right to express themselves openly— in a word our liberalism—  that that they fear, as these cables give evidence time and time again.

    One of the notes I jotted to myself while listening to these classified cables being read was “Theatre is inherently subversive.”  In a digital world, the simple act of consuming your art or your journalism off the electron grid qualifies as low-grade sedition.  Adding leaked classified documents as source material serves to spike the punch to an intoxicating level.  Tom Paine would recognize this work as what it plainly is: a tiny tune-up of world democracy.  It was theatre like this that gave birth to the Czech Republic.  No one person can ever fully comprehend or appreciate the enormity and the pervasiveness of its power.  But you can catch a glimpse.  And so I did, Sunday night.  NewsWrights United  currently plans to stage more of these WikiLeaks offerings, I’ll be sure to let you know so you can catch one too, and share the delicious sedition-steeped fun.  (Thought to be certain you keep current on NewsWright United’s doings, you should “like” us at Face Book.)

    Long live the United States of America.  And long live the blend of art and the treason that makes her rise, often against her own mendacious, mediocre volition, to her best.

  • It’s Been a Year

    I launched Just Wrought a year ago today with the essay “Towards a World Class Theatre”.  I am glad I did it, but now for reasons completely different from those I had when I started.  Back then I had no idea that through this blog I would gain the good friendship and professional working relationship I have with Jim Jewell, now the Managing Producer of NewsWrights United; or that I would get to know Lyam White, Jose Amador, and Omar Willey so much better.

    Conversely, I honestly did not suspect that I would lose some friends simply by saying publicly what I had always said to them in private bullshit sessions; but alas, this too is true, as some have conflated my arguments here about failures of leadership, courage and imagination in Seattle theater with personal aggression towards them and their livelihoods.  Some, but happily not all, or even most; because even more surprising than the estranged colleagues have been the artistic leaders who have reached out to me to say essentially, “I think a lot of what you say is crap, but I am glad you are saying it.”

    Just like nearly everything we do as artists—or really, humans— I have no idea if this project has succeeded, and I may never know.  I do not suspect for a minute that I have yet made even the slightest dent in the status quo of how theatre gets done in Seattle, but I do sometimes flatter myself with believing I have helped simultaneously broaden and sharpen the conversation.

    Of the thirteen formal essays I set out to write, I have managed to finish only five over the last 365 days.  Looking at the list now, I realize with certainty that I will never write at least three of them.  “Since When Are Directors Indispensable?” was going to point out that directors are a relatively new species in the long history of theatre, and that playwrights like Shakespeare and Moliere managed incomparable dramatic brilliance without them; but honestly, I don’t know of a single working playwright who leans more heavily on the talent of the directors he collaborates with than myself.  I literally cannot imagine producing Tuesday at Annex Theatre, or our current Living Newspapers, without Dawson Nichols, and the thought of the erstwhile Empty Space’s production of  Louis Slotin Sonata without John Langs at the helm, bringing together as he did all the amazing acting and design elements (not to mention his kick-ass choreography in the second act dance number) literally depresses me.  I could not do my work without directors, so what sort of non-hypocritical point was I hoping to make?  Perhaps only that the rising stock of the anti-collaborative idea of singular stage director auteurship, borrowed as it is from filmmaking, is a mistaken and destructive direction in theatre, especially when regional houses make season selections based on which plays will entice particular directors to work with them.  Throughout the 20th century stage directors gained power   mostly at the expense of playwrights.  The art form will regain health when that inequity is honestly addressed and steps are taken to resolve it.

    I also no longer plan to write about the deleterious arrangement Seattle theatre has with Actors Equity (the stage actors union), or how the viral nature of MFA programs for actors, directors and playwrights is weakening and rarifying our art form in this country.  I realize after this year of speaking out that as a college-dropout actor-turned-playwright, these are no longer my battles to fight.  Only the actors in this town can fix things so they have the same right to develop new works for the stage as actors in Los Angeles and New York; and only young people themselves can wake up and realize that chasing the imprimatur of higher education only takes them further away from the audiences that really need them, and that the excuse of needing a degree to make a living by teaching their craft only perpetuates the virus, while ultimately helping no one, including themselves.

    Of the five essays I did manage to write I am proud and stand by them.  Locally grown new plays do matter, and I see signs that Seattle is making more of them.  World Class Theatre does mean something, even when it cannot and should not be defined precisely.  Playwrights and designers can form some amazing alliances, and I earnestly hope for more of them, for myself and for the world of play development at large.  One-person shows are an easy way for a theaters to shirk the hard work of actually making new plays.  (All props and apologies to Mike Daisy, Jose Amador, Marya Sea Kaminski and everyone else who does such amazing solo work.  I don’t want you to stop.  I just want theatres to stop selling live story-telling  as “plays” {And yes, I understand that even that won’t happen.})

    That leaves five essays unwritten and unspiked.  The one most likely to see daylight in 2011 is “Stop trying to be Respectable, You’re in Show Business”; because I still see way too many of my Seattle colleagues cozying up for financial support and social legitimacy to the very same powerful interests that they should instead be looking for ways to indict theatrically.  I wish I had a condo payment for every time an otherwise  brilliant artistic administrator has baldly insisted to me that theatre is an elitist art form and therefore must depend on the good graces of corporations and  the upper class for its existence.  If I believed this, I would not only quit today, I would start doing everything I could to darken every stage currently producing plays in this city.  Thankfully, I know better.  As show people, we are at our best playing the dangerous fool, telling the wealthy and well-placed  who would teach us our art, what Lear’s Fool told Lear, “I am better than thou art now; I am a Fool, thou art nothing.”

    Just Wrought’s first year has been an often hectic, sometimes even bruising struggle.  Lately I have had to remind myself and others that I am an artist first, and an advocate only much further down my list of priorities.  Over the last few weeks I have been feeling a growing need to take time to lie fallow here for the sake of my creativity.  I resolve to listen more than I talk in 2011.  Of course that doesn’t mean I won’t be talking at all.

    Expanded conversations.  Bruising struggles over important ideas.  Greater clarity around the issues about which I should just keep quiet.

    Lost friends.  Gained friends. 

    It’s been a year.

  • Auditions for The New New News

    Auditions for The New New News

    All the sudden it just got very real up in this joint . . .

    Auditions for the The New New News: A Living Newspaper will take place Saturday December 11, 2010.

    If you are interesting in helping us make theatre for, by and most importantly about the people of the Pacific Northwest, then please send your headshot/resume to Managing Producer Jim Jewell at jim@newswrightsunited.org

    Project Description:

    The New New News: A Living Newspaper is the next installment of NewsWrights United’s Living Newspapers, and looks specifically at new media, journalism and the implications of monetization.

    The story follows an organization called The New New News, an online media source that covers the media coverage of Seattle. Their primary funder has given them 24 hours to double their site traffic or go under. How will the The New New News crew respond?

    The New New News will open at South Seattle Community College, move to the Erickson Theatre on Capitol Hill, and then wrap up at North Seattle Community College.   The production run is scheduled for mid-February through early March of 2011.  Rehearsals will start in mid-January.

    We are looking to offer 4 to 5 PAID non-union contracts with a projected $500 stipend at the beginning of the project and a share of box office at the completion..

    NewsWrights United is an associated program of Shunpike.

    Audition Information

    Audition/Interview Dates:   Saturday December 11, 2010 from 10a – 6p

    Audition Requirements: Sides-only audition. Sides will be available when you are scheduled for a audition.

    Character Breakdown / Project Needs:  We are casting for several roles, though which roles will be determined by the results of the auditions. There is a particular need for middle-aged or older men and women, though all ages are encouraged to audition, as well as people of color.

    Audition Location:  Email for appointment: jim@newswrightsunited.org. Drop-ins will not be seen. Auditions to take place at North Seattle Comunity College’s Stage One Theatre.

    Do it!

  • Steven Gomez Dives into the “World Class Theatre” Fray

    In my essay “World Class = Fighting Words” I argued that it is not necessary to specifically define what a World Class Theatre Town is in order to become one.

    We not only do not need to lock down what “world class” means, it would be unwise for any single one of us to try to do so. . . .  All the extremely smart Seattleites. . .  who demand something perfectly specific and quantifiable are, to my mind, like a group of outraged soda lovers storming Coca-Cola headquarters demanding: “What do you mean, ‘Coke is it?’  What the hell does ‘it’ mean?  You say you’d ‘like to buy the world a coke’?  You can’t be serious?  Do you know how much that would cost?”

    Admittedly, my dismissal of an absolute definition has never sat well with my fellows.  Like a gifted sullen twenty-something, still living in its parents’ basement, Seattle likes precision in its arguments, even when it knows it has no intention of ever acting on them.  We are, after all, a town of lawyer/coder/poet geeks.  We scored above average on our SAT’s and we palpably understand, goddammit, the difference between “Modern”, “Modernist”, and “Post-Modern.”  We should be able to put a fully logical box around any concept, including “World Class Theatre.”

    Because I continue to refuse to explicitly define “world class”, many feel free to ignore the goal as so much “sky pie”.  But not Steven Gomez.  Over at his blog, The Russians Used a Pencil, he has zigged away from the standard lackadaisical zag, and actually defined what world class would mean to his mind. 

    A World Class Theatre City does not import plays and actors for production. It predominately exports plays and renowned performers, while focusing on producing original, culturally striking work predominately from its community, rather than works from outside communities it perceives as supreme. A World Class city does not look up to other cities.

    You can see Steven Gomez’s full entry by clicking here.  Give it a read and leave him a comment.  Explain to him how you think he’s distressingly mistaken or inspiringly correct.  Bookmark him.  Bless him.  He’s joined the fray.  And you?

  • Another Step in the Right Direction from ACT

    Another Step in the Right Direction from ACT

    One of the most vital infrastructural components of World Class theatre towns like London and New York completely missing in otherwise vibrant theatre towns like Los Angeles and Seattle, is the intra-city play pipeline: a means for moving, within a given city, successful shows from smaller venues to larger ones so that they can reach more people and, yes, make more money.  With its announcement that it will be bumping up the recent hit Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog from its birthplace at Balagan Theatre on Capitol Hill to the Allen Theater space at A Contemporary Theatre in the heart of downtown Seattle, ACT seems to be indicating its willingness to attempt opening just such a pipeline.  And as much as it might pain a perpetual complainer to give credit where credit is due, this is by no means the first time in the last few years that ACT has taken a bold step.

    While Intiman flails about trying to figure out how to stay alive, and the Seattle Rep continues to… well, do whatever the hell it believes it’s doing  (Really?  Dancing with Lughnasa is so burningly urgent that you need to stage it every fifteen years?),  ACT has, under the artistic leadership of Kurt Beattie, and the entrepreneurial vision of Carlo Scandiuzzi, charged forward with innovation and risk-taking with an eye towards reaping the significant rewards that taking such risks can bring.  By introducing such novel programs as the Central Heating Lab and the ACTPass, maintaining the success of the Young Playwrights Program,  and nurturing informal partnerships with promising groups like New Century Theatre, Awesome and now Balagan, just to name a few, ACT has managed to do something few regional theatres anywhere can honestly claim: it actually lives up to its hypey catch phrase: “ACT: A Theatre of New Ideas”, and as a result, seems to be positioning itself to dominate Seattle’s theatre scene by creating an eclectic, constantly brimming shopping center of performance in the gorgeous historic old Eagles Building right next door to the Washington State Convention center.

    Apparently for now, of the Three Bigs, only ACT believes that Seattle really can be a World Class theatre town and that one of its LORT houses really can take steps to make that happen.  Now, will ACT keep it up?  In the past they have let crucial programs such as FirstACT and FringeACT die while they strived to stay alive.  The pressure of success is an all-together different beast than the pressure of failure.  Can they keep moving forward when expectations for their operations begin to rise beyond simple survival?  Can they keep taking chances even when some risks will inevitably reap failure?

    Golly, I hope so.  And what’s more, I’m really starting to believe it.

  • NewsWrights’ Awareness & Fundraising Event – How’d we do?

    NewsWrights’ Awareness & Fundraising Event – How’d we do?

    NewsWrights United held its first ever awareness/fundraising event, Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? this past Monday night.  After taking a few days to recover, I thought it was high time to take a look at how we did.

    Goal 1: Raising Awareness

    The Excerpt Reading

    The evening’s kick off entertainment came with Dawson Nichols’ staging of the first scene of our working script for upcoming second edition of our Living Newspaper: The New New News, featuring the inestimable talents of Robert Agostinelli, Shawn Belyea, Khanh Doan, Amy LoveJoseph P. McCarthy, and our own Wes Andrews.  It is rollercoaster fun for a playwright to watch talented professional actors read, after very little rehearsal, words one collaborated to wright.  One moment you stand horrified helpless witness as they mangle laugh lines you crafted and treasured so dearly; the next moment thrill blossoms again as they find whole new laughs you never expected or designed.  Shawn Belyea embodied the definition of a professional actor– versus, say, a very talented and eager amateur– when he managed to wring the biggest laugh of the night out of losing his place in the script.

    Excerpt Reading from The New New News: A Living Newspaper featuring Robert Agostinelli, Khahn Doan, Amy Love and Shawn Belyea (left to right)

    The Panel Discussion

    Our Consulting Producer, Tom Paulson, ran this discussion of the current state of journalism, with such local luminaries as legendary sports columnist Art Thiel, new media maven, Monica Guzman, Mark Higgins, Metro Editor for The Seattle Times, Brendan Kiley, Theater Critic and Features Reporter for The Stranger, and Chris Grygiel, coordinator of political coverage for the Seattle P-I.com.  Personally, I found this panel discussion the most exciting portion of the evening.  Tom pointed hard-hitting questions at everyone in the room, and not one of the panelists shied away from answering frankly, a rare occurrence, as you would know if you have attended similar discussions in the last couple years.  Journalists have been very leery about hashing through the woes of their industry.  For a quick rundown of the various points-of-view represent, I cannot do better than the rundown provided by Jake Ellison over at Seattlepostglobe.org, which you can check out by clicking here.

     The Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? Panel.  Tom Paulson (in cap) moderates Paul Mullin, Mark Higgens, Monica Guzman, Chris Grygiel, Art Thiel, and Brendan Kiley.  (Left to right.)_

    One moment seemed to leap out for nearly everyone in the room.  Several good friends gave me their feedback in the days after and nearly all of them specifically mentioned the earnest and well-argued exchange between Art Thiel and Brendan Kiley regarding the definition of a journalist.  Is it, as Art argued, an expert in a certain field or, per Brendan, an aggressive novice?  One friend clearly felt Brendan played the wrong-headed asshole in the debate; the other friend, however, remarked on how freaked out he was by what he viewed as Art’s vehement defensiveness.  To a playwright this sounds like magic.  When you can produce something on stage from which different audience members can draw diametrically opposed notions of who the villain was, then you are most definitely cooking with gas.

    GRADE FOR AWARNESS RAISING – 95% – “A”

    Goal 2: Raising Funds

    Of course, the second and co-equal goal for Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? was to raise additional funds for our upcoming second edition: The New New News: A Living Newspaper.  We did that, posting a considerable surplus for the evening, but we could have done it better.  We are a new organization and still learning out how to do the all things we need to do to survive and thrive.  We will get better at this.

    GRADE FOR FUND RAISING – 82.7%  – “B-minus”

    And now to you . . .

    Because we continue reaching for our support goals, I would like to ask you right now to consider joining the NewsWrights team as a supporting member.  We have a wide spectrum of levels at which you can join.  I ask you to consider coming on as at least a Cub Reporter for a donation of $25.  Dawson Nichols smartly modeling the vintage, limited edition Seattle P-I cap available at the $50

    At the $50 level you will be listed in our program as a Columnist and in recognition of your generosity, you will receive, while supplies last, a limited edition Seattle P-I ball cap just like the one you see Artistic Producer Dawson Nichols smartly modeling in the photo  to the right.

    At the Desk Editor level, representing a $100 gift, you will receive two hats,  plus two reserved seats to any performance including one of our three opening nights, as we deliver the paper to Seattle’s doorstep in three neighborhoods: West Seattle, Capitol Hill and Northgate.

    At the $1,000 “Media Mogul”  level you will receive all of those perks, plus coverage of any local story you want by NewsWrights United, because we, like certain cable TV news operations, can clearly be bought.

    Finally, if all you can spare is $10, we would be deeply grateful to have you join our team as a Newsie

    The bottom line is we want your support– any support– because your support represents your “buy-in” to our mission, and that keeps us strong both fiscally and spiritually. So please consider joining us at whatever level you can.  It’s as easy as clicking on our trusty upside-down  NewsWrights Support Fedora, below.  It will take you to our Shunpike donation page. 

    Donation hatThank you so much for filling our hat with your support!

    (Also, if you have not already done so, please consider “liking” our Face Book page here.  For now, it is the very best way to keep track of our doings and some very evocative discussions around current journalism issues. )