Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Category: Essays on the Unreal

  • A Thousand Words on Grief

    One… Two… Three…

    When I proposed writing an essay about grief to The Stranger, my editor said I could have a thousand words.

    “…Not one single word more. Grief is boring,” he said. “No one can understand except for the person going through it, and talking about it is like telling somebody about a dream you had. No one else understands, no one else really cares, and talking it out makes you look weak, needy, and a little bit nuts.”

    I don’t disagree.

    Still, a thousand words. Sounds like a lot, but, as we all know, it equals no more than just one picture. And so that’s what I’ll try to give you. A picture. Just one.

    118, 119, 120.

    At the end of her life my mom insisted on home hospice, which was the teensiest bit ironic because she was homeless at the time. So, here’s the picture I want to offer you: my studio apartment, hospice bed crowded into it, my mom lying upon it and suffering, horribly. Also pushed into this cramped room, a double futon in the corner, where my boyfriend and I sleep.

    Now picture that for three months.

    195, 196, 197.

    When she finally died, I wasn’t there, but my boyfriend was. He’s never forgiven me. He suspects my mom did it on purpose: one last twisted trick; one last assertion of will. It would certainly be like her to try and avoid sharing with me this ultimate moment of weakness, and instead inflict it on this boyish man whom she never really came to respect. Or that’s how my boyfriend sees it anyway. I suspect he might be right. (I keep calling him my boyfriend. He’s not my boyfriend. Not anymore. We broke up a few months after my mom passed. It was like she was the glue sticking us together, and she had evaporated.)

    Grief is a mind fuck.

    318, 319, 320.

    Grief is psychotropic, sometimes even hallucinogenic. In its deepest throes, ghosts and other terrifying apparitions appear, though in fairness, these ghosts and apparitions aren’t always terrifying. Sometimes they are comforting, which triggers the terrifying realization that you have come to depend on them. There’s a derangement that occurs. It still feels insane that she’s not here, not reading this over my shoulder, and then of course, I get chills, because often it does feel exactly like she’s here, reading over my shoulder, whispering the words along with me as I read back through this. It feels insane. And it makes me happy. It’s sanity that feels sad. And I’m so goddammed sick of being so goddamned sad.

    And now I hear my editor’s voice. “I told you this would be boring, Syd.”

    453, 454, 455.

    Grief is a necromancer. You can wind up romancing the dead so much that you lose touch with the living, who become shades, and everything tastes like ashes.

    We eke out our living moments just like I’m stinting on these words in this parsimonious essay, when sometimes it’s far better to squander. For instance, in this case, even though I only have a few words left, it might be better to unroll a long quote from Ulysses:

    In a dream, silently, she had come to him, her wasted body within its loose graveclothes giving off an odour of wax and rosewood, her breath, bent over him with mute secret words, a faint odour of wetted ashes.

    Her glazing eyes, staring out of death, to shake and bend my soul. On me alone. The ghostcandle to light her agony. Ghostly light on the tortured face. Her hoarse loud breath rattling in horror, while all prayed on their knees. Her eyes on me to strike me down. Liliata rutilantium te confessorum turma circumdet: iubilantium te virginum chorus excipiat.

    Ghoul! Chewer of corpses!

    No, mother! Let me be and let me live.

    I no longer live in that studio. My “real job” here at The Stranger, allows me to “afford” a “real apartment”, with its own bedroom and bathtub. And I don’t share the place with anyone. And yet I think I would give just about anything to be crammed into that studio again, with my old boyfriend and dying mother, living with the terror of her someday being gone rather than living with… well, with whatever this is.

    Why are the main characters in horror stories so often grieving? In that same vein, why do I feel frightened all the time? It’s like her death has torn some vital skin off me, which was protecting my sense of certainty and safety. My fear is not of death, but of living without her: of her both being here with me, and not with me, at the same time, if that makes sense.

    It’s been nearly two years now since she left. I can still spend days lost staring at nothing. What am I supposed to do? How am I supposed to move forward? She took a hunk of me with her and I’m never getting it back.

    I still write things thinking she will read them. (She was a journalist. They called her Girl Gonzo, and compared her to Hunter S. Thompson, though she hated the nickname, and believed Thompson was, ultimately, something of a coward.)

    She still talks to me. She still edits my work. As I type this now, I hear her: “Maudlin”, “Personal without being intimate or evocative.”

    So why is it that I know with a certainty that if someone gave me a pill and told me that it had the power to cure me somehow, maybe magically, of all my grief, I would take that pill and I would flush it down the toilet?

    I’m broken by all this. Forever broken. And that’s a bummer. But everything’s broken. It’s the nature of all this. To paraphrase Leonard Cohen, that’s how the light gets in.

    Is it getting better? I don’t know. It’s getting different. I think. Grief alters your mind.

    999, 1,000…

    One.

  • Day 11 / Reason 11: Debt

    Day 11 / Reason 11: Debt

    The playwright, puppeteer, and savage wielder of whimsy, Scot Augustson gave me a book recently. It’s called Debt: the First 5,000 Years by David Graeber. One cannot call the volume concise, nor is it completely clear to me yet what the author’s bottom line thesis is, though he seems to be circling around a fascinating notion that the responsibilities and complex, nuanced relationships among individual human beings, as well between humans and institutions, ideals, gods, demons, etc., all got flattened into a two-dimensional space with the introduction of coinage and currency. A formerly infinitely complex mapping of memories, obligations and gratitude, became something so stark and simple it could be captured in a simple ledger. Of course, I could be way off: I still have another couple hundred pages to go, plus footnotes, which I can’t stop leafing to; but this is the general whiff I’m sniffing at the moment.

    I was reading the book last night before falling asleep five minutes later, but in that short time I started to wonder: what do I owe the theatre, and what does the theatre owe me?

    It’s an awkward thing to confess in the wider civilian world that one is a playwright. I stopped doing it pretty early in my career. The inevitable follow-on questions just lead to more and more frustration on both sides.

    Have I ever seen anything you’ve written?

    Probably not.

    Where have your plays been done?

    In the Mystic Realm of 99 Seats.

    What are your plays about?

    The usual: neutrons, genomes, philosophical zombies.

    What’s the most you’ve ever been paid for a play?

    Less than I drink in a bad year.

    It might shock you to hear it, but I have my pride. So I would often attempt to end conversations such as these by stating something wildly arrogant like, “Let’s put it this way: I’m the best playwright you’ll ever meet.” And then I’d skulk away, silently hoping that this civilian never met Scot Augustson, or Kelleen Conway Blanchard, or Yussef El Guindi or…”

    So yeah, bottom line: I considered myself a pretty good playwright, back when I was wrighting them. I certainly left everything I had out there on the stage before I retired from it. Having written over twenty full-length plays and countless smaller works for the stage, I felt by the end of my run that I had certainly given theatre at least as much as theatre had given me. We were square.

    But I’m starting to consider, inspired by this tome which Scot bequeathed upon me, that maybe debt doesn’t work that way. Maybe our obligations, our relationships and responsibilities, our needs and our gifts can never be balanced on a ledger. Certainly not when it comes to creativity.

    If it hadn’t been for the theatre, I would have never memorized Sonnets 29, 76 and 130; I’d still have a thickish Baltimore accent (even dough Bawlmore dudn’t have en accent, hon.); I wouldn’t have have moved to New York City— twice, and most likely would never have come to Seattle in search of greener theatrical pastures; I wouldn’t have met the funniest people in the world, whom I now count among my dear friends; I would have never known the sheer terror of having an actor on opening night utterly blow the big monologue I wrote for them while I sat 15 feet in front of her in the first row, or the astounding heart-expanding elation of pulling off a show when only 8 hours before the stage was a mess of cables, unpainted set-pieces and infuriated cast and crew.

    If it wasn’t for theatre, I wouldn’t be sitting here on a Saturday morning writing this mini-essay, because I wouldn’t have learned to write at all. Which means my recent books, of which I’m so proud The Starting Gate and Seattle Trust and which ostensibly stand apart from my dramatic achievements, would not exist. And perhaps worst of all, I wouldn’t be able to claim to know the likes of Yusef El Guindi, Kelleen Conway Blanchard, and Scot Augustson. And with no Scot, there’s no book about debt in my hand.

    So yeah. I’m going to go to the theatre tomorrow. For the first time in eight years. Not because I owe it to myself or to the art form or to anyone or anything. And not because the art form owes me squat. But sometimes friends just want to be with friends and do those things that friends do together.

  • Graveyards in Heaven

    6/21/17

    Last night I dreamed I was walking through the graveyards of heaven.

    [I couldn’t read the names on the stones.]

    But I did rubbings all the same.

  • On Collaborating with Luck

    On Collaborating with Luck

    I wrote this note in my journal a day or two prior to the world premiere of one of my plays:

    12/7/–
    I believe [actor] will rise to something with this show. I have to believe that and I do. When we give up totally on luck, when we try to drive it meanly into the narrowest of margins of pure reason, that’s when it really lashes out nasty. This is a project that ran on luck: good fortune and good will—from the get go. I can believe it’s going to abandon us now. It’s practically a collaborator.

    Let me stipulate to an important point from the outset. Of course luck —strictly speaking— doesn’t exist. But that fact doesn’t exclude the notion from having a profound effect on the preponderance of people who believe in it. For that matter, the list of things that do not—strictly speaking—exist, but that still affect believers—and often non-believers, too—via the membrane of consciousness, is long and evocative:

    • Faith
    • Fate
    • Hope
    • Love
    • Justice
    • Free will
    • Evil
    • Life after death
    • Etc.

    Arguments for the non-existence of all of these have been convincingly and consistently posited. Even consciousness itself has been advocated for inclusion in this group of “things-we-ardently-believe-in-but-should-understand-do-not-actually-exist”. See the works of Daniel Dennett and Suzanne Blackmore for relatively compelling arguments in this vein.

    So why should grown rational human beings even indulge in considerations of luck at all? Well, I would contend that perhaps it pays to pay attention to luck in the same ways it pays to give notions such as “free will” and “consciousness” the benefit of the doubt. Belief in luck might be a bit like being able to see the grid of a chess board: ultimately unnecessary, but plainly helpful in playing the game.

    ASPECTS OF LUCK

    Here are some things most of believe about luck:

    • Luck follows luck. Or, restated: luck, good and bad, comes in runs.
    • Luck runs out.
    • Luck favors the prepared.
    • Good karma brings good luck. (In the West we tend to egregiously conflate the notions of “luck” and “karma”. In places where karma is contemplated as an article of faith, the concepts are quite separate.)
    • Even losers get lucky sometimes.

    Regardless of whether we believe in luck, all of these propositions require us to notice it. It’s this noticing that gives luck its power.

    MY LUCKY WEEK

    I have a lucky week and it’s coming up. In my early teens I started noticing  that good things happened for me on March 10th, which is also my half-birthday. Coincidence? I think not. Luck scorns coincidence. Later, in my 20’s, I began noticing that fortune tended to concentrate its beam on me throughout the entire week, from March 10th through March 17th.  Notice that? My lucky week has eight days. Why? Well, duh! ‘Cuz it’s LUCKY!

    I have landed several jobs in my lucky week. I have opened several plays that turned out to be important and favorable for my career in the theatre. My wife was born on March 16, the second to last day of my Lucky Week. Indeed, she has started to piggy back on the Lucky Week’s power, having had some very fortunate things happen for her within its span.

    Some superstitious sorts might argue that talking about my Lucky Week is about the least lucky thing I could do, tantamount to abrogating all of its effects. I call horseshit on this. The very essence of the thesis I am tendering is that luck only matters, only exists, only has power, if we notice and celebrate it. In other words, the God of Luck to whom I pay reverence craves having reverence paid. The more I talk about my Lucky Week the more powerful it becomes, especially in this, the 49th year of my life. (I won’t digress to explain the particular puissance of seven’s square.)

    LUCK CONNECTS US TO THE INEFFABLE

    We are a pattern-seeking species, a tendency which has served us well over the deca-millennia. Even when the patterns we saw weren’t, strictly speaking, real—dippers in the sky, the comings and goings of Persephone, regular chariot races of  sun and the moon– recognizing them still helped us survive and thrive.

    When we see luck running through the events of our lives, we palpate a substance that we have helped generate through our own hard work and tenacity. Luck connects us to the ineffable, to the patterns of life we can’t quite otherwise understand. Courting luck creates a working relationship with the otherwise overwhelming randomness of existence. By contemplating it we coax and kneed meaning out of meaninglessness. Sometimes it’s enough to realize just how lucky we are in any given moment, like striking a match and tossing it into a pitch dark well: perhaps a pointless gesture in the grander scheme of things, but our lives are short, and the grander scheme of things is often—no, almost always—beyond our ken. Luck is a map of the unknown and unknowable forces that buffet our lives. Of course it doesn’t exist. All models are wrong, but some models are useful.

    LUCK LIKES TO BE FED

    The professional golfer, Gary Player, widely recognized as one of the sport’s all-time greats, says “The harder I practice, the luckier I get.” And I say, with the approach of my Lucky Week in my Lucky Year, “From your mouth, Gary, to God’s non-existent ear.” After twenty-five years of working almost exclusively in the theatre, I have been working hard for several years now on a slate of new things: memoir, fiction, writing these essays and poetry. This March I could use a well-earned lucky break.

    PS I’m thinking this might be the first in a series of essays titled “In Praise of Unreal Things”.