Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Tag: The Stranger

  • A Thousand Words on Grief

    One… Two… Three…

    When I proposed writing an essay about grief to The Stranger, my editor said I could have a thousand words.

    “…Not one single word more. Grief is boring,” he said. “No one can understand except for the person going through it, and talking about it is like telling somebody about a dream you had. No one else understands, no one else really cares, and talking it out makes you look weak, needy, and a little bit nuts.”

    I don’t disagree.

    Still, a thousand words. Sounds like a lot, but, as we all know, it equals no more than just one picture. And so that’s what I’ll try to give you. A picture. Just one.

    118, 119, 120.

    At the end of her life my mom insisted on home hospice, which was the teensiest bit ironic because she was homeless at the time. So, here’s the picture I want to offer you: my studio apartment, hospice bed crowded into it, my mom lying upon it and suffering, horribly. Also pushed into this cramped room, a double futon in the corner, where my boyfriend and I sleep.

    Now picture that for three months.

    195, 196, 197.

    When she finally died, I wasn’t there, but my boyfriend was. He’s never forgiven me. He suspects my mom did it on purpose: one last twisted trick; one last assertion of will. It would certainly be like her to try and avoid sharing with me this ultimate moment of weakness, and instead inflict it on this boyish man whom she never really came to respect. Or that’s how my boyfriend sees it anyway. I suspect he might be right. (I keep calling him my boyfriend. He’s not my boyfriend. Not anymore. We broke up a few months after my mom passed. It was like she was the glue sticking us together, and she had evaporated.)

    Grief is a mind fuck.

    318, 319, 320.

    Grief is psychotropic, sometimes even hallucinogenic. In its deepest throes, ghosts and other terrifying apparitions appear, though in fairness, these ghosts and apparitions aren’t always terrifying. Sometimes they are comforting, which triggers the terrifying realization that you have come to depend on them. There’s a derangement that occurs. It still feels insane that she’s not here, not reading this over my shoulder, and then of course, I get chills, because often it does feel exactly like she’s here, reading over my shoulder, whispering the words along with me as I read back through this. It feels insane. And it makes me happy. It’s sanity that feels sad. And I’m so goddammed sick of being so goddamned sad.

    And now I hear my editor’s voice. “I told you this would be boring, Syd.”

    453, 454, 455.

    Grief is a necromancer. You can wind up romancing the dead so much that you lose touch with the living, who become shades, and everything tastes like ashes.

    We eke out our living moments just like I’m stinting on these words in this parsimonious essay, when sometimes it’s far better to squander. For instance, in this case, even though I only have a few words left, it might be better to unroll a long quote from Ulysses:

    In a dream, silently, she had come to him, her wasted body within its loose graveclothes giving off an odour of wax and rosewood, her breath, bent over him with mute secret words, a faint odour of wetted ashes.

    Her glazing eyes, staring out of death, to shake and bend my soul. On me alone. The ghostcandle to light her agony. Ghostly light on the tortured face. Her hoarse loud breath rattling in horror, while all prayed on their knees. Her eyes on me to strike me down. Liliata rutilantium te confessorum turma circumdet: iubilantium te virginum chorus excipiat.

    Ghoul! Chewer of corpses!

    No, mother! Let me be and let me live.

    I no longer live in that studio. My “real job” here at The Stranger, allows me to “afford” a “real apartment”, with its own bedroom and bathtub. And I don’t share the place with anyone. And yet I think I would give just about anything to be crammed into that studio again, with my old boyfriend and dying mother, living with the terror of her someday being gone rather than living with… well, with whatever this is.

    Why are the main characters in horror stories so often grieving? In that same vein, why do I feel frightened all the time? It’s like her death has torn some vital skin off me, which was protecting my sense of certainty and safety. My fear is not of death, but of living without her: of her both being here with me, and not with me, at the same time, if that makes sense.

    It’s been nearly two years now since she left. I can still spend days lost staring at nothing. What am I supposed to do? How am I supposed to move forward? She took a hunk of me with her and I’m never getting it back.

    I still write things thinking she will read them. (She was a journalist. They called her Girl Gonzo, and compared her to Hunter S. Thompson, though she hated the nickname, and believed Thompson was, ultimately, something of a coward.)

    She still talks to me. She still edits my work. As I type this now, I hear her: “Maudlin”, “Personal without being intimate or evocative.”

    So why is it that I know with a certainty that if someone gave me a pill and told me that it had the power to cure me somehow, maybe magically, of all my grief, I would take that pill and I would flush it down the toilet?

    I’m broken by all this. Forever broken. And that’s a bummer. But everything’s broken. It’s the nature of all this. To paraphrase Leonard Cohen, that’s how the light gets in.

    Is it getting better? I don’t know. It’s getting different. I think. Grief alters your mind.

    999, 1,000…

    One.

  • Was Mission Creep/Diffusion the Smoking Gun of Seattle Theatre’s Decline?

    Was Mission Creep/Diffusion the Smoking Gun of Seattle Theatre’s Decline?

    It all started with me bitching about a Stranger review.  (Come to think of it, that’s how a lot of it starts.)  Now, full disclosure, I actually wrote one of the pieces in Balagan Theatre’s outdoor show King Arthur and the Knights of the Playground, but this ain’t my first rodeo, so I can assure you I’m highly unlikely to complain about a review simply because it’s negative.  (Press is press after all.)  What bugged me was that Goldy began his analysis of the show with a quintessentially flawed premise. 

    “If the best children’s theater amuses and engages adults as much as children, then Balagan Theatre’s world premiere … doesn’t make the grade. Still, the kids seemed to love it, and you can’t beat the ticket price—free—for the next three weekends in parks around the city.” 

    So thusly irked, I posted a link to the piece on Face Book along with the following note: “Ah the old, “children’s-theatre-must-also-equally-please-adults”  trope.  How tiresome it truly is.”

    In flooded the comments and quickly the discussion drifted, fueled at times by troll-power alone, to the larger question of whether theatres should feel free to stray from their missions in pursuit of general excellence. 

    Commenter  “I’m not sure why you’re advocating for being “middle of the road” and only pleasing your base. I want theater companies to make great theater.”

    Paul Mullin Why would a children’s theatre seek to have artistic viability outside of being a children’s theatre? That’s like asking a GLBT theatre to appeal to straight audiences. It’s confounding.

    Around and around we went, with narrowly scoped opinions glibly offered as evidence for the larger dismaying trends of Seattle Theatre.

    Commenter  You’re so niche-y! Every theater wants/needs an audience. Yeah, you go after your core demographic, but it also makes sense to go after OTHER demos as well. …. Consistently ONLY targeting one group is boring and not healthy for a theater, artistically or financially.

    Paul Mullin  Can you back this opinion up with any facts? Because it seems to me to be a pretty viable business plan to know your audience and target it…. And I would further maintain that it’s exactly when arts orgs seek to please the aesthetic intelligentsia that they start going off the rails.

    Commenter  Really? So Intiman/ACT/Seattle Rep should only produce shows that appeal to its supporter base, i.e. 65 year old, upper middle class retirees? Constant revivals of Neil Simon and Vanities and Dancing at Lughnasa? Isnt’ that why the big rep houses are dying…they’re aging along with the subscriber base?

    I was just about to beg off the merry-go-round for good when a long-time friend and colleague leaned in with some extremely crisp and compelling insights.

    Rebecca Olson*  This is going to be very shocking, but I actually agree wholeheartedly with Mullin on this one. First, we need to separate the idea that having a clear mission (ie: ensemble generated new work) means doing work that isn’t new/interesting/pushing the box. Having a clear mission is exactly what non-profit organizations are required to do, and what a lot of theaters in Seattle are lacking. What makes a theater excellent is consistently excellent work. Having a clear mission that you stand behind does not make that impossible, and having a broad non-mission (ie: “Our theater is here to make theater,”) does not mandate good work. However, history does seem to be teaching us that having both – a clear mission *and* producing consistently excellent work (ie: Wooden O Theater) creates a lasting organization.

    One of the most enlightening conversations I’ve had in my theatrical life was with the late (and very much missed) Melissa Hines, who described how when the Seattle theater scene was young, the “big” theaters (Rep, ACT, Intiman, Empty Space) each had clear missions, and filled specific niches. This is a broad generalization (so please don’t nitpick,) but basically the Rep did modern classics and newish but box office safe shows from Broadway, ACT was slightly more edgy but close to the Rep, filling in the summer season when the Rep was dark, the Intiman did classics, and Empty Space did brand new/quirky/edgy work. Audiences could subscribe to all four theaters and have a completely different experience at each theater; thus, there was no “competition” for audiences.

    However, at some point the Rep/ACT/Intiman theaters began spreading out and away from their original mission/focus, and all began to look alike (and the Empty Space closed.) As the big theaters homogenized, it became increasingly clear that moving away from their original missions was not allowing them opportunities to push the envelope and try new things. Instead, it was spreading them thin with too many choices and not enough structure; when one has the opportunity to select from the entire canon, from ancient Greece to modern classics to current new regional hits, to plays not yet written, seasons start to look like a dusty college textbook of “what plays are important for you to know about” rather than an exciting collection of stories for artists and audiences to explore together. 

    In addition, this homogenization encouraged audiences to pick one theater and ignore the other theaters; since one season mirrored another, there was no reason to subscribe to all three. This created the climate of competing for an audience.

    Finally, it alienated a lot of lifetime theatergoers, who were irritated at being constantly force fed something not to their liking. While some audiences want to see Shakespeare, others want edgy new work, and some want to modern American classics. Audiences began to feel obligated to watch something they didn’t enjoy because it was part of the season they had chosen to subscribe to. Instead of educating and challenging their audiences, over time it simply lost people completely.

    Thus the crux of my conversation with Melissa, was that to have organizations that last (which are part of an artistically healthy theatre community,) we need to ask our theaters to figure out what they do that is unique and fantastic, and then ask them to do only that, and do it consistently. For example, I would be disappointed if Strawshop decided to dust off “Guys and Dolls.” On the flip side, it seems natural that 5th Avenue produced “Guys and Dolls” this year –and I would be disappointed if 5th Ave decided to try their hand at “The Laramie Project.” It isn’t that these companies are doing every kind of theater all the time; it’s that they have found their niche, and they are filling it well with consistently interesting, artistically sound productions. If I want to see a good musical, I know where to go. If I want to see productions that are intensely creative and topical, I know where to go.

    I am not suggesting an organization become boxed in by a mission that is too confining to allow it to grow, develop and mature over time (ie: Our mission is to produce the plays of Paul Mullin.) I am suggesting that having a mission that is clear but not confining (ie: Our mission is to produce the plays of Northwest playwrights) gives artists/organizations a starting point and framework for choosing their seasons, and gives audiences a clear idea of why they might (or might not) be interested in attending. Missions such as “We want to produce interesting plays that challenge our audiences,” may feel like they allow for more options, but until the statement is so obvious as to be embarrassing (let us all assume that no theater is hoping to product uninteresting plays that bore their audiences), and gives no indication why exactly that organization exists, or what it is offering the community that other theaters are not already offering.

    And I am also not suggesting that artists be completely tied to the organizations they primarily work with; if I belonged to a company that produced new plays but I wanted to do an all female version of Hamlet with myself in the title role, I should either pitch the idea to a local classical company or self-produce.  And if the artistic director of a theater who produces classical worked decided that she wanted to direct a production of a new Paul Mullin play, I would encourage her to again, find a company doing new work to pitch the idea to, or self-produce. A non-profit organization’s responsibility is to serve the community – both the artistic community and the audience. If Seattle theatre history has taught us anything, it is that while sometimes fun for the artists who are involved, muddying the water of your organization’s mission and season with random, off point productions is confusing to your audiences and does not serve the organization in the long run.

    ***

    *Rebecca is an actress based in Seattle, performing with theaters throughout the region. She also has worked extensively as a fundraiser for the arts, both on staff and as a consultant to arts groups of all sizes, as well as a volunteer for several arts boards and committees.

  • The Early Scoop on The New New News

    The Early Scoop on The New New News

    The early news on The New New News is in… and it’s good!

    In Mónica Guzmán Preston’s post over at Intersect, “My favorite moment from the @newswrights play ‘The New New News” (a meta- media laced headline if there ever was one), she describes:

    … one of those moments in storytelling where, in ways you couldn’t have predicted, disparate elements of narrative and meaning all come together.

    For this longtime fan of the much misunderstood mass microblogging service, it was fantastic.

    I am one NewsWright who is delighted that Monica enjoyed the show, especially since she helped us so much in the early phases of our research, suggesting leads, pointing us toward whole new stories to run down, inviting us into her “meet-ups”.  We do wonder, though, if she recognized herself in any of the characters.

    * * *

    Jose Amador, at the Seattlest says:

    There’s nothing about News that’s passive, or simple; very little that is formulaic… which is unusual and welcome in an age where everything can and will come to you. At the end of the night… one is rewarded with an excess of interesting thoughts about the world we inhabit….

    * * *

    And then The Stranger’s Brendan Kiley chimed in.  He hasn’t seen it yet, but that doesn’t stop him from recommending it:

    ….[NewsWrights United] put together The New New News—about the rise of local blogs, how the Seattle Times got a Pulitzer Prize for its readers’ Twitter coverage of the Maurice Clemmons manhunt, and what happened to Art Thiel when he started his own blog and had to get tangled with selling his own ads. Judging by their last effort and the seriousness of their material, The New New News should be scarier than the ersatz Mack the Knife.

    * * *

    I particularly enjoyed Rosemary Jone’s interview at Examiner.com because it gives NewsWrights United’s Managing Producer, Jim Jewell a chance to say why he believes in the work we do.

    Right now, theater looks to me like newspapers in the 90’s, watching changes all around them and somehow believing themselves above the change, too venerable to fail. We spend too much time in the theater talking about what theater is instead of actively engaging the form and deciding what it will be, and we aren’t too far from the crisis newspapers have found themselves in: failure to evolve.

    * * *

    So what does all this good news for NewsWrights mean to you?  Well, for one it means that if you had hoped not to leave Capitol Hill to see the show, you better order your advance reservations soon.  We have only one week at the Erickson, and it starts tonight.   The following two weekends will be staged at Theater One on the North Seattle Community College campus (advance reservations for those performances here).

    Of course, you can always risk walking up because we always hold back a quantity of pay-what-you-can seats.  You just  have to ask yourself, are you really cheaper than the majority of your Capitol Hill neighbors?  If so, show up early.  All evening performances start at 7:30 pm.  The matinee is at 2 pm.

  • NewsWrights’ Awareness & Fundraising Event – How’d we do?

    NewsWrights’ Awareness & Fundraising Event – How’d we do?

    NewsWrights United held its first ever awareness/fundraising event, Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? this past Monday night.  After taking a few days to recover, I thought it was high time to take a look at how we did.

    Goal 1: Raising Awareness

    The Excerpt Reading

    The evening’s kick off entertainment came with Dawson Nichols’ staging of the first scene of our working script for upcoming second edition of our Living Newspaper: The New New News, featuring the inestimable talents of Robert Agostinelli, Shawn Belyea, Khanh Doan, Amy LoveJoseph P. McCarthy, and our own Wes Andrews.  It is rollercoaster fun for a playwright to watch talented professional actors read, after very little rehearsal, words one collaborated to wright.  One moment you stand horrified helpless witness as they mangle laugh lines you crafted and treasured so dearly; the next moment thrill blossoms again as they find whole new laughs you never expected or designed.  Shawn Belyea embodied the definition of a professional actor– versus, say, a very talented and eager amateur– when he managed to wring the biggest laugh of the night out of losing his place in the script.

    Excerpt Reading from The New New News: A Living Newspaper featuring Robert Agostinelli, Khahn Doan, Amy Love and Shawn Belyea (left to right)

    The Panel Discussion

    Our Consulting Producer, Tom Paulson, ran this discussion of the current state of journalism, with such local luminaries as legendary sports columnist Art Thiel, new media maven, Monica Guzman, Mark Higgins, Metro Editor for The Seattle Times, Brendan Kiley, Theater Critic and Features Reporter for The Stranger, and Chris Grygiel, coordinator of political coverage for the Seattle P-I.com.  Personally, I found this panel discussion the most exciting portion of the evening.  Tom pointed hard-hitting questions at everyone in the room, and not one of the panelists shied away from answering frankly, a rare occurrence, as you would know if you have attended similar discussions in the last couple years.  Journalists have been very leery about hashing through the woes of their industry.  For a quick rundown of the various points-of-view represent, I cannot do better than the rundown provided by Jake Ellison over at Seattlepostglobe.org, which you can check out by clicking here.

     The Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? Panel.  Tom Paulson (in cap) moderates Paul Mullin, Mark Higgens, Monica Guzman, Chris Grygiel, Art Thiel, and Brendan Kiley.  (Left to right.)_

    One moment seemed to leap out for nearly everyone in the room.  Several good friends gave me their feedback in the days after and nearly all of them specifically mentioned the earnest and well-argued exchange between Art Thiel and Brendan Kiley regarding the definition of a journalist.  Is it, as Art argued, an expert in a certain field or, per Brendan, an aggressive novice?  One friend clearly felt Brendan played the wrong-headed asshole in the debate; the other friend, however, remarked on how freaked out he was by what he viewed as Art’s vehement defensiveness.  To a playwright this sounds like magic.  When you can produce something on stage from which different audience members can draw diametrically opposed notions of who the villain was, then you are most definitely cooking with gas.

    GRADE FOR AWARNESS RAISING – 95% – “A”

    Goal 2: Raising Funds

    Of course, the second and co-equal goal for Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? was to raise additional funds for our upcoming second edition: The New New News: A Living Newspaper.  We did that, posting a considerable surplus for the evening, but we could have done it better.  We are a new organization and still learning out how to do the all things we need to do to survive and thrive.  We will get better at this.

    GRADE FOR FUND RAISING – 82.7%  – “B-minus”

    And now to you . . .

    Because we continue reaching for our support goals, I would like to ask you right now to consider joining the NewsWrights team as a supporting member.  We have a wide spectrum of levels at which you can join.  I ask you to consider coming on as at least a Cub Reporter for a donation of $25.  Dawson Nichols smartly modeling the vintage, limited edition Seattle P-I cap available at the $50

    At the $50 level you will be listed in our program as a Columnist and in recognition of your generosity, you will receive, while supplies last, a limited edition Seattle P-I ball cap just like the one you see Artistic Producer Dawson Nichols smartly modeling in the photo  to the right.

    At the Desk Editor level, representing a $100 gift, you will receive two hats,  plus two reserved seats to any performance including one of our three opening nights, as we deliver the paper to Seattle’s doorstep in three neighborhoods: West Seattle, Capitol Hill and Northgate.

    At the $1,000 “Media Mogul”  level you will receive all of those perks, plus coverage of any local story you want by NewsWrights United, because we, like certain cable TV news operations, can clearly be bought.

    Finally, if all you can spare is $10, we would be deeply grateful to have you join our team as a Newsie

    The bottom line is we want your support– any support– because your support represents your “buy-in” to our mission, and that keeps us strong both fiscally and spiritually. So please consider joining us at whatever level you can.  It’s as easy as clicking on our trusty upside-down  NewsWrights Support Fedora, below.  It will take you to our Shunpike donation page. 

    Donation hatThank you so much for filling our hat with your support!

    (Also, if you have not already done so, please consider “liking” our Face Book page here.  For now, it is the very best way to keep track of our doings and some very evocative discussions around current journalism issues. )

  • Better-Late-Than-Never Breaking Press for “Journalism: a.WAKE.ning?”

    Better-Late-Than-Never Breaking Press for “Journalism: a.WAKE.ning?”

    Extra!  Extra!

    As luck and irony would have it, all the press for Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? is breaking late, fast and furious.  Here’s a rundown of what came across the wires this weekend:

    The Stranger

    The Sunbreak

    Seattle Theatre Examiner

    • The Gist:  Now is exactly the time to gamble on locally grown new plays.
    • The Pull-quote:  “The previous golden age of American theater was smack-dab during the last Great Depression,” said Mullin. “We must not sit around on our hands waiting for the rich to pay us to make art for them. The rich don’t need our help and they will not share our vision. We need to make art for the people who are suffering in these drastic times, and let the chips fall where they may. We need to enter the fray.”
    • The Link: http://www.examiner.com/theater-in-seattle/no-better-time-to-produce-theater-seattle

    Late buzz is better than no buzz at all, and we are grateful for it. 

    So if you haven’t already bought your tickets, don’t feel bad but DO IT NOW!   Click HERE to make your order at Brown Paper Tickets, or if you’re feeling lucky and pressed for time, buy them at the door.

    Either way . . .

    We’ll see you tonight!

  • At Least One of Our Theatre Critics is also a Journalist

    At Least One of Our Theatre Critics is also a Journalist

    Brendan Kiley just broke some more substantiated details on the crisis at Intiman Theatre over at The Stranger’s Slog.

    So my question for The Seattle Times would be, where was Misha Berson on all this? 

    There’s an old joke about the Seattle ethos of crippling “niceness”.

    In Chicago, the car behind you will honk as soon as the light turns green.

    In New York, the car behind on you will honk exactly one second before the light turns green.

    In Seattle, the light can cycle through green yellow red… green yellow red… green yellow red… forever before anyone will discover that you’ve keeled over dead of a heart attack.

    So, was Misha just going to wait until a press release was pushed out? Or should our only surviving daily newspaper step up and occasionally do some shoe-leather arts reporting  without solely relying on the story the perpetrators choose to tell us?

  • Get your Tix Now for the Journalism/Theatre Event of the Year

    Get your Tix Now for the Journalism/Theatre Event of the Year

    Tickets just $20 at Brown Paper Tickets.

    Monday November 15, 2010 – 7:30-9:30pm

    The Upstairs Gallery above Theatre Off Jackson

    NewsWrights United is throwing a party. What kind of party is up to you.

    Do you want to toast the rebirth of journalism, or drown your sorrows at its untimely demise?

    We’ll start your evening with a complimentary glass of champagne or shot of rye (toasting or drowning?). Visual art and installations, complimentary hors d’oeuvres and a cash bar await you in the gallery.

    We’ll offer up a preview scene from our upcoming Living Newspaper, The New New News, and highlight the evening with a panel discussion on new media and journalism moderated by NewsWrights producer Tom Paulson and featuring Pulitzer Prize-winning P-I political cartoonist Dave Horsey, Monica Guzman of Intersect.com, Publicola‘s Josh Feit, local sportswriting legend Art Thiel, The Stranger theatre critic Brendan Kiley, and Chris Grygiel, coordinator of political coverage for the P-I blogs.

    Get ‘em now before the all get got!

    Tickets just $20 at Brown Paper Tickets.