Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

  • Maurice Clemmons is in the Air

    Maurice Clemmons is in the Air

    Over the last 48 hours on-line news sources have exploded with fresh stories about Maurice Clemmons, the prematurely released Arkansas felon who, on the Sunday after Thanksgiving, 2009, walked into a coffee shop outside Tacoma, Washington and murdered four Lakewood Police officers as they drank their morning coffee.  Clemmons then led law enforcement on a two-day wild goose chase throughout Western Washington before being shot dead in Seattle by a lone cop.  In those two days it became clear that local journalism would never be the same, not in Seattle, not anywhere.

    It is this very urgent transition which we cover in our latest production The New New News: Living Newspaper, investigating the on-line reportage of the Clemmons Manhunt in a section we call “#WAshooting” after the Twitter hashtag used to track tweets concerning the ongoing chase.  We are fairly certain that our upcoming opening, (Friday, February 18) has exactly nothing to do with the recent rash of articles about Clemmons, but we welcome the renewed interest in the case nonetheless, and not just because it might cause the curious to check out our show.  The story of Maurice Clemmons will not go away, nor should it, because its implications affect the future of Western Washington, U.S. national politics and the nature of journalism across the globe.

    Certainly the once-and-possibly-future presidential candidate Mike Huckabee is hoping we forget about Clemmons.  While Governor of Arkansas, Huckabee granted clemency to the 8-time felon, who otherwise would have been incarcerated until 2015, in part because Clemmons claimed in his application that he came from “a very good Christian family.”  (One need not wonder what Huckabee’s decision would have been if instead “Muslim” had been the adjective modifying the subject of that clause.)

    Likewise, it is not hard to trace a deterioration of relations between Western Washington police and the communities they serve since Clemmons’ murderous rampage.  Had Maurice never left his Arkansas prison would Seattle Police Officer Ian Birk have given Native American wood-carver, John T. Williams, more than four seconds to put down his carving knife before shooting him dead? 

    We will never know the answer to that, but we do know with certainty that active crime investigations will never be covered the same anywhere in the future.  From now on, journalists, law enforcement, regular citizens, and yes, even criminals, will all be privy to instant information, some of it deeply flawed or downright false, as it emerges on Twitter or whatever tool we will be using to share data.  We examine this fundamental shift in The New New News.  I could tell you how, but really, I’d rather show you.  The first copy drops on West Seattle’s doorstep a week from Friday.  Why not order your “subscription” now?

    Cross-posted at NewsWrights United: The Blog.

  • Shakespeare Would Hate Us

    Shakespeare Would Hate Us

    A couple of weeks ago I mentioned to a friend of mine that I was thinking of auditioning for The Wooden O this year, since for the first time in a years I won’t be on vacation during their run.  My buddy, who happens to be a Seattle firefighter, but whose wife acts with the O on occasion, trotted out a taunt he likes to tweak me with: “But Paul, you hate Shakespeare.”

    He bases this facetious conclusion on a challenge I proposed some years back calling on all Seattle  theatres to self-impose a Shakespeare hiatus for one year.  Brendan Kiley, Arts Editor for The Stranger, picked the idea up and wrote about it here.  I still genuinely believe this would be a grand and beneficial experiment, but not because I hate Shakespeare—quite the opposite.  As a playwright I flatter myself that I understand the man’s genius better than most of the directors and actors who worship so sycophantically at his altar for all the wrong reasons. 

    “It’s the language that makes his plays so exquisite.”

    “No, it’s his sumptious, multifaceted characters.”

    “No, no, it’s the tradition, the chance to etch one’s mark on the living canon of performance.”

    It’s all bullshit.  Shakespeare was a great—yes, even the greatest—playwright for one and only one simple reason: he wrought great plays.  All the rest is just so much makings.  You might praise a chef for her choice of ingredients, but you wouldn’t claim them as the reason for her genius.  A year without Shakespeare would help us gain some much needed clarity and distance from the material.  We would come back to it ready to attack with refreshed hearts.  And it would also get us off his cash-cow tit for long enough to taste a little bona fide self-sufficiency.  Hell, we might actually miss Shakespeare.  That currently unfathomable notion alone would make a break worth it, wouldn’t it?

    Never mind.  I already know the answer.  It was shouted at me and Kiley at the Seattle Theatre ShitStorm back in 2008.  And it has been shouted just as fiercely upon every subsequent mention.  “Never!  We will NEVER stop staging Shakespeare. Not for a year.  Not for a month.  How dare you!?  You and the rest of your modern playwright ilk are not fit to wipe the soles of his pointy shoes.”  The level of vituperation one encounters upon even suggesting a breather from the bard naturally calls a paraphrase of one of his more famous lines to mind, “Methinks the status quo doth protest too much.”

    Yes, American Theatre literally worships Shakespeare.  And I have to laugh, because I am pretty sure he would have hated us.

    Shakespeare was a playwright, poet, player and proprietor, in equal measure, despite our hindsighted emphasis on the first of those four.  He made plays to make money and he made a lot of both. He would hate our precious process of endless workshopping plays to an early death on dusty shelves.  At the Globe you worked the problems of a play in performance. 

    He would hate that people more often read his plays than see them.

    He would hate, or not have been even able to comprehend, a system in which playwrights make plays for performance in cities far from where they live, for less than it costs them to create, for the narrowest sliver of society.

    He would hate that so many modern American playwrights have never acted and never produced, have never done anything in a theatre except watch silently from dark seats.

    Since he shared them, he would sympathize with the milquetoast middle class aspirations of most American playwrights—“I just want to have a house and a family and make the same kind of money as my friends I went to college with”— but he would grow to hate them eventually.  Shakespeare may have envied his social superiors, but he also knew at his core he was better than them.

    He would not hate that we kiss the asses of our benefactors and patrons, but he would hate how poorly and surreptitiously and self-loathingly we do it; almost never managing, as he did, to flatter and skewer with the same loaded lines: floating sublimely above, then suddenly crawling at them from beneath, being everyone and no one at the same time with such stunning success that even today reasonably sane and educated people entertain themselves with the pseudo-intellectual dalliance that he did not even write the plays which he so clearly did.

    He would have hated the MFA system for generating new viral spores of actors, playwrights and directors when there isn’t enough work for the ones already in the system.

    He would have hated the advent of the auteur director, smothering the natural brilliance of his plays with their dense cloying concepts.

    He would hate that artistic administrators make the decisions about which plays get done, instead of a consensus of proprietor/players, all sharing the ownership of the theatre, and thus the risks and rewards.

    And most of all, he would hate our necrophilic prejudice for his plays, even the poor ones, over anything new, even the good ones.  As the consummate playwright, he would want us to love the living writers as much or more than the dead.

    So, yeah, I’m pretty sure if Shakespeare were alive today he would hate us.

    And he’d be writing for television.

  • The Blogs are Alright

    The Blogs are Alright

    Does it automatically mean you are stuck in a self-referential rut as a playwright when the same talented young actress who, back in 2008, played a character based on your wife, less than three years later gets cast in a completely different play portraying, not a character based on you, but actually you, the playwright?

    Rehearsals have begun for The New New News: A Living Newspaper, and true to our promise, NewsWrights United is publishing blogs from members of the cast and crew.  You can get ‘em while they’re hot over at NewsWrights United: The Blog.

    I really couldn’t be more delighted with the material that the New New Newsies are generating, while simultaneously managing to rehearse the show, take care of their families, go to school, and/or hold down full-time jobs.

    • You can read It’s Not in the P-I-veteran Brian Thomas Gould ranting about “The Table Read” and how he uses it to read his director based on the roles he’s been cast in.
    • Or check out “Memories of Homemade Bombs” in which NewsWright Actor Tammy Batey recounts her days as an actual ink-and-paper journalist covering Stratton R. Maxey for the Federal Way Mirror.  On April 14, 1999, Maxey accidentally blew off his left hand while handling a homemade bomb.
    • And then, of course, there’s Courtney A. Kessler’s “Playing the Playwright”, in which she relates her experience as an actor playing both my wife, scarcely disguised as the character Jenny Wolfe in The Don Juan Cult Concerto, as well as more recently myself, in a brief scene in The New New News about how NewsWrights United decides to cover our stories.

    By the way, you can order tickets for the upcoming New New News here.  We know you wanna.

  • The New Posters are Here! The New Posters are Here!

    The New Posters are Here! The New Posters are Here!

    Could I be more excited?!

    The new posters are in for The New New News: A Living Newspaper, and NewsWrights United’s magnificent Managing Producer, Jim Jewell, will be handing them off to Keep Posted for delivery around the Puget Sound. Soon you’ll be seeing one on the wall of your favorite tragically hip coffee shop!

    Could I be more pleased!? 

    No, I don’t think I could.

    (Haven’t been so happy about a poster since this.)

    For more information on the show, and how to order reservations in advance, click here.

  • Extra! Extra! The New New News to Drop at a Seattle Doorstep Near You!

    Extra! Extra! The New New News to Drop at a Seattle Doorstep Near You!

    It’s official.  We have the dates and we are rolling out the press release to local and national media as I post this.  The second edition of NewsWrights United’s Living Newspaper: The New New News will be delivered at three—count ‘em, THREE!—theatrical doorsteps throughout Seattle: North, South and Central.  I am enclosing the release, authored by our magnificent Managing Producer, Jim Jewell, so that you can have all the coveted details:

    *****

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    January 13, 2011

    Media Contact:  Jim Jewell, Managing Producer
    jim@newswrightsunited.org
    206.359.1738

    NewsWrights United presents…
    The New New News:
    A Living Newspaper about
    Journalism in the Age of New Media

    SEATTLE, WA – NewsWrights United will be delivering the next edition of their Living Newspaper to neighborhoods throughout Seattle this spring with The New New News: A Living Newspaper, opening February 18, 2011 at Olympic Theatre at South Seattle Community College (SSCC). The New New News will remain at Olympic Theatre through February 20, 2011 before moving to Erickson Theatre on Capitol Hill February 24-27, 2011 and finally to Stage One Theatre at North Seattle Community College (NSCC) March 2-13, 2011.

          The New New News: A Living Newspaper was written by NewsWrights Executive Producer Paul Mullin and Creative Producer Dawson Nichols, in collaboration with Editing Producer Tom Paulson, and will be directed by Nichols.

          The New New News: A Living Newspaper examines journalism in the age of new media, paying special attention to the implications to information and democracy created by the collapse of newspapers, the 24-hour news cycle and the demands of monetizing media. The play follows the staff of The New New News, an online news provider dedicated to coverage of online news, after their primary financier has given them just 12 hours to double website traffic or be shut down. Coverage of the Maurice Clemmons manhunt and The Seattle Times’ subsequent Pulitzer win, NW sports-writing legend Art Thiel’s efforts to launch and monetize his own sports site, hyper-local political bloggers, live-and-mobile streaming and the ascendance of Twitter underscore The New New News crews’ efforts to create immediate and compelling news. The New New News examines the choices journalists make when their livelihood is on the line and success is measured by the eyeball and the minute.

          This is the second Living Newspaper produced by NewsWrights United, serving a similar function as the first while breaking new ground. “It’s Not In The P-I was about the death of a newspaper,” says Nichols. “The New New News is about journalism in the new media environment – who produces it, who consumes it, how it is different from the journalism we have known.  Like the first play, this one is local and timely, addressing these issues through stories and people that are rooted in Seattle.”

          These are familiar themes for NewsWrights, as they view part of their mission as the revitalization of both theatre and journalism, and localism as a key to success. Jokes Mullin, “Immediacy comes in two basic flavors: one of time and one of space.  When you bring journalism into a theatre, you bring the two different flavors together for an explosively tasty combination!  It’s better than peanut butter and jelly.”

          This newest Living Newspaper will once again be produced in cooperation with NSCC’s theatre program (which is led by NewsWrights’ producer Nichols), and will bring together professional actors with NSCC students. The professional cast includes Michelle Chiachiere, Mark Fullerton, Joe Ivy, Catherine Kettrick, Joe McCarthy and Jordan Williamson. Dan Schuy from NSCC serves as Technical Director, Lighting Designer and Set Designer.

        The full performance schedule for The New New News: A Living Newspaper is as follows:

    Olympic Theatre at South Seattle Community College (SSCC)
    6000 16th Ave. SW, Seattle, 98106
    Friday February 18 and Saturday February 19 @ 7:30pm
    Sunday February 20 @ 2pm
    https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/148545

    The Erickson Theatre on Capitol Hill (part of Seattle Central Community College)
    1524 Harvard Ave, Seattle, 98122
    Thursday February 24, Friday February 25 and Saturday February 26 @ 7:30pm
    Sunday February 27 @ 2pm

    https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/148614

    Stage One Theatre at North Seattle Community College (NSCC)
    9600 College Way North, Seattle, 98103
    Wednesday March 2 at Noon
    Friday March 4, Saturday March 5, Friday March 11 & Saturday March 12 @ 7:30pm
    Sunday March 6 and Sunday March 13 @ 2pm

    https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/148619

    All performances Pay What You Will. Advance reservations available at Brown Paper Tickets for each performance venue as listed above.
         

    NewsWrights United would like to thank 4Culture, Vulcan, Shunpike and their many individual donors for supporting The New New News and other programs of NewsWrights United.

    ###

    About NewsWrights United
    NewsWrights United
    was founded in 2009 by playwrights Paul Mullin and Dawson Nichols and former P-I reporter Tom Paulson to produce It’s Not in the P-I: A Living Newspaper About a Dying Newspaper. Managing Producer Jim Jewell and Dramaturg Wes Andrews joined the team in summer 2010. NewsWrights United’s mission is to produce and advance the form of the Living Newspaper – local, topical stories pursued with journalistic rigor and presented through the medium of live theatre.

    About Shunpike
    Shunpike is a 501(c)(3) non-profit art service organization whose mission is to strengthen the Seattle arts community by partnering with small and mid-size arts groups to develop the business tools they need to succeed. Working in close partnership with these groups, Shunpike helps solve problems quickly and impart vital skills in finance, organizational management and arts administration.

  • The Macallan Talks – Side Two

    The Macallan Talks – Side Two

    A few days ago I shared a transcript I recently found from the first half of a cassette tape recording that William Salyers and I made one evening in 1997 while consuming a bottle of Macallan scotch, each.  As promised, I share the second half of the full transcript at the end of this post.

    We are clearly getting drunker on side two.  Alas, this does not increase the insightfulness of our comments.  Just the opposite, I’m afraid.  I sure don’t like myself very much as the discussion wears on.  It feels to me, thirteen years later, like I am trying to badger Bill into believing he will be a better artist once he admits he’s an artist and opens himself up to– what?—the “wider universe”; the “heroism of art”, or whatever woo-woo crap 30-year old-Paul was spouting.  At one point, I literally say to him: “I think you need to start reading folktales.”  Can you even get more excruciatingly Left-Coast Joseph Campbellish condescending than that? 

    In the intervening time since I gave him this advice Bill Salyers has gone on to world premiere the title role in Louis Slotin Sonata  in Los Angeles and then off-Broadway, winning himself several awards and enormous critical acclaim for his efforts.  He also world-premiered my play An American Book Of The Dead – The Game Show, directed the world premiere of The Good Ship Manhattan, world premiered The Sequence playing future Nobel Laureate, Francis Collins, and these are just the examples from my scripts. The quality of his work as an actor in an even broader panoply of plays —classic, modern or brand new (mine and others) — is legend.  And I think it is safe to say that Bill never really changed his point of view from the one he espouses in these recordings.  In other words, for all my high holy exhortation to become a better artist by first admitting he is one, Bill remained a great artist, and became an even greater one, simply by being Bill.  Lesson learned: not all heroes and artists want to be heroes and artists— some don’t even believe in such things— and yet, somehow, art and heroism still happen.

    So, with that, here’s some highlights, then the whole thing at the end if you’re interested:

    Blowing smoke up Salyers’ shorts while simultaneously patronizing him

    PAUL:  I consider you to be as great an artist as I’ve ever met.  I consider you… to…I consider that I need to learn things about my craft that you’ve already learned about yours.  I’ve also– yeah!  And I’m starting to, because you’ve worked at your craft.  You’ve been pragmatic hands-on with your craft in a lot of different ways that I’m just starting to: I’m starting to write for television, you know.  I’m starting to… write for hire.

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  You know?

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  Which you’ve been doing for a while.  In fact, in some ways, you… that’s what you do is act for hire…. Except on projects like TUESDAY where you chose to do it because of– of whatever feelings you have for the work.  Um… but I– but I think the one thing that I’ve always kind of instinctively known, whether it was because of my religions upbringing, or because of my attraction to art.

    BILL:  Mm-hm

    PAUL:  Because my attraction to art was one of a knight in shining armor.  And we can talk about that too.  Uh…I have revised my vision– but not completely on that.  Um… I do think that artists are true heroes.

    BILL:  Hmm?  (Maybe this is sort of a verbal shrug?)

    PAUL:  True heroes.  That true artists are those people who um…. and I include that person who can make the exquisite phad tai, or… or the exquisite scotch, or, or can uh… well, we can talk about that maybe later, but– I feel like one of the things that– that you refuse to admit is that that which you do is beyond your control–

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  To a certain extent.  And you’re uncomfortable with that.

    Devolving into faux-Jesse Jacksonism

    PAUL:  For many people– for the born-again Christians of the world– I would nothing but heartily convince them that there is nothing outside themselves.

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  That that world which they have created is their own fucking fucked-up… vision of the world.

    BILL:  Yeah.

    PAUL:  And that that which they hate is themselves.  And that which they love is a… sweetened aspect of themselves and that they have not left themselves.

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  You… you I would encourage you to see the other aspect of the universe, and that is that you are constantly connected in a thousand million different ways to that which you feel unconnected to.  And that that the– that the satellite– you’re either a satellite revolving around the sun or you are the revolution.  You know?

    BILL:  Mmm.

    PAUL:  You know?

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  And uh… not to sound like Jesse Jackson.   Although that would be– Fuck, man.  I should write for Jesse Jackson ‘cuz that’s great!

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  That’s better than anything Jesse’s said in a long mother-fucking time. 

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  You’re either that which revolves around the sun, or (Jesse Voice) you are the revolution!

    BILL:  You’re right.  That does sound like Jesse.

    PAUL:  Umm.  Except it doesn’t rhyme.  But it’s– it’s a little too sublime for Jesse.  We’ll have to find some other demagogue for it.  But– although I love– my heart goes out to Jesse.  I can’t hate, Jesse.  He’s fab–  Did you hear his speech the last convention?  It rocked.

    Mullin lays an Irish curse on Salyers

    PAUL:  There’s– There’s this great Zen koan that I love.  Says– the young monk comes to the master, and says, you know, “I’m meditating but I’m too cold.”  And the Zen master says, “Well, you know when cold go to that place where you are so cold that it kills you and when you are hot go to that place where you are so hot that it kills you.”  And I lay this Irish curse on you: “Live in that universe where there is no art.  Be that universe where there is no art.”

    BILL:  Well, I think I’ve tried to.  I mean, I–

    PAUL:  No, I mean it.

    (Paul laughs.)

    PAUL:  NO, I MEAN IT!

    (Paul laughs hysterically.)

    BILL (drunken voice mockery of Paul):  You don’t understand!

    On whether an actor should ever argue a director down

    BILL:  This stuff about– this stuff about uh– nobody stops to think about the fact that there was a director involved in that show.  It wasn’t just about what Steven wrote.  It wasn’t just about what I did, you know?  What I– when I’m– when I’m rending my hair, my fake hair, at an incredible point and I go, “RENFIELD!”  That’s not necessarily my choice.

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  That’s me doing what I was told the best way I could.  And I’m–

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  And I’m presented with the challenge of trying to find truth in that.  Now a lot of actors would have argued Eddie down….  That’s not my job.  It’s not my– it’s not my job to uh– promote myself–

    PAUL:  Is there ever a time when it’s right to argue a director down?

    BILL:  Yeah, when you’re the other director. 

    (Paul begins to groan very lowly. )

    BILL:  If you’re an actor your job is to do what you’re told as best as you possibly can.

    PAUL:  Wow!  Okay!  We come to the truth of it.

    BILL:  I’ve– I’ve long said that.  If you want to direct a play go fucking direct a play.

    PAUL:  Well, wait a second.  Wa-wa-wa-waaaiiit a second

    BILL:  Okay.

    PAUL:  Because I think it’s not as facile as that.

    BILL:  I think it should be.  I think if you’re a craftsman it is.

    PAUL:  Ah well.

    BILL:  –And that’s why I’m not an artist.

    PAUL:  Hmmm.

    BILL:  I– I don’t have any patience for that crap.  I mean, it’s another– it’s another– it’s another way that the film world has invaded what we do.

    PAUL (overlapping):  Well, here we go.  Well, here we go is what I’m saying is like, yes, as the novice, rookie, bullshit actor who’s got a little taste of Stanislavsky, a bad taste via Mr. Uh– Strasberg.

    BILL:  Strasberg, yeah.

    PAUL:  Uh….  That’s the last thing they need to be doing is telling the director what their choices are.  But let me tell you something about Mr. (slurry) Mr. Eddie Levi Lee, is that you know more about theatre in your fucking, you know, nose–

    BILL:  Then I, then I–

    PAUL:  Hair clippings than Eddie Levi Lee knows.

    BILL:  Okay, then if I– if I believe that going into it, I’m a hypocrite when I sign the contract.  And I’m not a hypocrite… so I sign the contract.

    PAUL:  I–  augh!

    On whether an actor should ever refuse a line change from a director

    PAUL:  Billy, you’re saying– you’re saying to me that in no circumstances would it be right for you as one of the best actors that I know uh… to– to call bullshit on a director.  That

    BILL:  I’m saying it’s not my job.

    PAUL (overlapping):  That fucking frightens me.  No, it is your fucking job!

    BILL:  No, it’s not.

    PAUL:  Yes, it is your fucking jo–

    BILL:  I don’t agree with you.

    PAUL (overlapping):  I went to– John Sylvain came to me and said– I had a line that said, “I threw that pass–”  now obviously this is an actor/playwright, a whole ‘nother issue.

    BILL:  I know the line you’re talking about, too.

    PAUL:  Yeah, said, “That fucking nigger dropped it.”

    BILL (simultaneously):  “That fucking nigger dropped it.”

    PAUL:  And Johnny said, “You need to cut that.”  And I said, “You need to go fuck yourself, because one, it’s the night before opening, and two, it’s the fucking script, and THREE, it’s the way we rehearsed it.

    BILL:  Well, let me– let me tell you something.  I’m not saying– don’t misunderstand me.  In that same situation I would have asked John to keep the line.  I wouldn’t have told John to go fuck himself, because John’s the director.

    PAUL:  No!  No!  No!.  But see that’s where I digress with you, because John’s fucking with my shit there and he has no business doing it.

    BILL:  Brother, it’s not–

    PAUL:  And he deserves–

    BILL:  It isn’t your shit!

    PAUL:  Yes!

    BILL:  It’s our shit.

    To follow is the full transcript of the second side of the cassette.

    (more…)

  • The Macallan Talks – Side One

    The Macallan Talks – Side One

    Giving my demons the year off  has left me time to take care of some housecleaning, like backing up my old files to the cloud before my next hard drive crashes.  About a week ago I ran across a couple of old Word files that I thought were lost forever: transcripts from something called “the Macallan Talks”.  The premise was simple: two full fifths of Macallan 12-year-old scotch, a cassette tape recorder, William Salyers and myself.  We would talk about what we always talked about, but capture it on tape finally so that I could transcribe it and then possibly either publish or stage it.  Or at least that’s what I recall the plan was.  This was over thirteen years ago, so I’m not really sure what I was thinking.  All I know is that this conversation has never seen the light of day until now.

    Mostly you get an ardent exchange between two friends who love talking, especially to each other.  Bill and I still blather like this, whether on the phone, since we no longer live in the city, or into the wee hours over scotch and illicit cigarettes, on the now ever rarer occasions when we do manage to get together in person.  What strikes me most clearly now looking over these transcripts is how little our positions have changed in the intervening years. Bill still ardently defends his “craft” against any woo-woo incursions of higher powers or purposes.  I still maintain that what we do, when we do it well, matters in sublime and fundamental ways we can only barely glimpse in fleeting, incomplete flashes.

    Had I made these discussions public at the time, I am convinced that they would have been dismissed as the pompous rantings of a pair of third-tier theatre artists who thought way too highly of themselves and each other.  Now?  Well, nothing’s changed.  All of that is essentially still true (sorry Bill, at least you have a television career), but somehow I imagine (hope?) that the intervening near decade and a half gives our arguments some resonance beyond the moment.  Of course, the final analysis is up to you.  I publish the full first cassette side transcript at the end of this post.  I will publish the second side in another upcoming post.  In the meantime, some highlights from the first half:

    On lying and acting . . .

    (I try to start the tape without Bill knowing but he can tell something’s different about my face.  I’m a horrible liar…. )

    PAUL:   So let’s talk about lying.  Is a good actor a liar or not a liar.

    BILL:  Well you know what Plato thought about that?

    PAUL:  What?

    BILL:  He literally thought–

    PAUL:  Micky Mouse’s dog?

        (beat)

    BILL:  I was about to imitate him and then I realized I couldn’t. 

        (He laughs.)

        ‘Cause he doesn’t–

    BILL & PAUL (together):  Say anything!

    . . . .

    BILL:  From what I remember reading in college, Plato said that actors should be killed because they lie.

    PAUL:  See I consider myself a pretty good actor and I cannot lie to save my life.

    BILL:  Well, I can lie but I consider them to be two separate things.  I don’t… I don’t lie unless I absolutely have to, and I hold that to a pretty high standard.  It’s not about my convenience.  I’ll take a lot of shit before I’ll tell a lie.  Because of that thing we were talking about.  About how it’s an allowance.  How responsibility comes with the power.

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  And the only way I can tell a lie is to buy into myself.

    PAUL:  Yeah, so you involve yourself in the Dark magic.

    On art versus craft . . .

    BILL:  . . . I think the word “art” is pretty useless.  It is so subjective as to be pointless–

    PAUL:  Like “love” or something like that?

    BILL:  Exactly.

    PAUL:  Well, what would you replace it with?  Or would you?

    BILL:  I’m not sure that you need the word.  It’s almost used to describe that which people don’t have the capacity to describe another way.  When someone says “art” they’re either collectors talking about something that’s worth a lot of money, or they are people who are moved beyond the ability to express… that.

    PAUL:  What about when somebody says, “The way that guy does phad thai is a frickin’ art?”

    BILL:  he’s talking about a transcendent experience     that goes beyond what he understands as being the execution of… the act.

    PAUL:  Well, what about that?  Is there something to that?  I mean this “transcendent experience”– if we don’t have a name for it beyond “art” shall we not call it that?

    BILL:  I think it’s the height of craft.  When I approach a role there are a whole lot of givens.  I think particularly in acting, and particular among young actors, there’s a need to over romanticize what we do.

    PAUL:  Well, yeah… and then you get into that nastiness of Method and that whole “I-must-go-through-that-which-my-character-has-go-through” nonsense.

    BILL:  Yes.  That’s right.  And actors saying things like– in all seriousness– “I don’t like to like to take about the craft ’cause I don’t like to over analyze it.  And if I over analyze it, I’ll kill it.”

    PAUL:  Which– yeah– sounds like somebody who…

    BILL:  Doesn’t know what the fuck they’re doing.  that’s exactly right.

    On going the dangers and responsibilities of playing a dark role

    PAUL:  … Ok, I’m gonna go on the record about TUESDAY.  I think that the reason why TUESDAY was hard was because you had met the wall with your “craft”, and with TUESDAY you had to be an artist.  And you were an artist, but it hurt because you were entering a realm where– to use those fantastic mytho-terms– you entered the realm where you were naked and raw.  It’s like the total hero’s journey.  At the beginning we see the hero and he’s kick-ass, but he finally meets the challenge that is capable of kicking his ass.  And then it becomes interesting.  That’s where the heart becomes involved.  And that’s why I argue this art-versus-craft argument over and over again.  And that’s why I’d like to try and get to the meat of it.

    BILL:  So you’re a masochist, because art has to hurt.

    PAUL:  No…   No…  It’s an old Buddhist thing.  You see Westerners misunderstand Buddhism because they think it’s nihilism.  Because they say, “Well what a Zen Buddhist does is he sits in a room for eight hours, and that’s torture!”

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  And it is torture, and I do kinda share the opinion that the people that are attracted to Zen are masochists, but I do it, and I’ve sat in a room for 8 hours and I’ll probably do it again.  See the problem is most Westerners misinterpret Buddhism as saying “You must suffer.”  And I would interpret it slightly differently.  I would say true Buddhism is: “You will suffer.”  But ultimately the suffering is as unimportant, if not more unimportant than the pleasure.

    BILL:  So you don’t glorify the suffering.

    PAUL:  No.  Not all.  The suffering is a message.  And there’s something to be said for computer metaphors– the suffering is like an error message, saying, “Ok, error in sector B.  You’re suffering.  Why?  Why are you hurting?”  Like, why does it hurt to do TUESDAY?…  And you’re looking for reasons like your technique wasn’t quite right,  and I’m saying no.  You’re doing everything right.  You just refuse to admit that that which you are doing is more important than you think it is.  And that that which you are doing is more connected and more vital and more rooted in who you are than you feel comfortable with as a craftsman.

    BILL:  Well my reaction to that is first of all is that… if we go that way for a moment, if we accept that as a truism, I have absolutely no problem in saying I’m not interested in that.  I’m not interested in self-flagellation in public.  That has no–

    PAUL:  Well, first off that’s not what I’m talking about.  And second off, if you were to say that to a Zen master, he’d probably give you a whack on the head, but then he’d say, “Who cares what you’re interested in?”  No one cares what you’re interested in.

    BILL:  But remember I act for selfish reasons.

    PAUL:  Well, maybe it’s time to wake up. . . .

    To follow is the full transcript of the first side of the cassette. 

    (more…)

  • NewsWrights Reads WikiLeaks

    NewsWrights Reads WikiLeaks

    If this be treason, make the most of it!
    Patrick Henry

    A couple weeks ago— though it seems like half a year in this hyper-speed news cycle that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have helped spin even faster— incoming Tea Party Congressman, Allen West stated publically that he not only considered Assange’s decision to leak classified State Department cables to be an act of treason, but equally treasonous the  further dissemination of  the leaks by any news agency in the country.  He baldly called for American news outlets to be censored for running stories based on the WikiLeaks’ cable dump.  [Read more here.]  Then later Allen back-tracked and said, “I didn’t say ‘censored.’  I said ‘censured.’”

    Last Sunday evening, while the Seahawks staggered to their NFC West Championship win, NewsWrights United’s Wes Andrews led five other theatre artists: Jose Amador, Llysa Holland, Spike Friedman, Ramon Esquivel and Josh Parks, in publically reading excerpts of the leaked cables at Annex Theatre in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood.  Personally, I was proud to be in the audience participating at least vicariously in what the blow-hard Tea Bagging demagogic moron, Allen West, considers sedition.

    The excerpts the actors chose to share originated from consulates spanning the globe from Venezuela to Iran, and included both inspiring stories of personal heroism to gossip about absurdly profligate parties thrown by quasi-governmental gangsters in the Caucasus [see here].  Perhaps the most striking feature of these communiqués is the remarkably consistent quality of writing: far better, far more cleanly evocative than most of what passes for journalism these days.  Apparently the authors, diplomats spread across the globe, all consider themselves members of a secret elite club who compete to impress each other with their wry yarns spun from foreign adventure.

    While the events described vary widely, one theme came clearly through each of the cables read Sunday night.  People in other countries care deeply about the United States of America.  No, they don’t love us, perhaps don’t even respect us.  But they care what we do and what we think.  A lot.  And those of them that hate and/or fear us don’t do so because of our aggression and our imperialism.  These crass aspects of Americanism are the ones they actually understand and abide, and even hope to emulate.  No, it is our blithe and breezy free-thinking, our defiance of authority, our belief in the individual and his or her right to express themselves openly— in a word our liberalism—  that that they fear, as these cables give evidence time and time again.

    One of the notes I jotted to myself while listening to these classified cables being read was “Theatre is inherently subversive.”  In a digital world, the simple act of consuming your art or your journalism off the electron grid qualifies as low-grade sedition.  Adding leaked classified documents as source material serves to spike the punch to an intoxicating level.  Tom Paine would recognize this work as what it plainly is: a tiny tune-up of world democracy.  It was theatre like this that gave birth to the Czech Republic.  No one person can ever fully comprehend or appreciate the enormity and the pervasiveness of its power.  But you can catch a glimpse.  And so I did, Sunday night.  NewsWrights United  currently plans to stage more of these WikiLeaks offerings, I’ll be sure to let you know so you can catch one too, and share the delicious sedition-steeped fun.  (Thought to be certain you keep current on NewsWright United’s doings, you should “like” us at Face Book.)

    Long live the United States of America.  And long live the blend of art and the treason that makes her rise, often against her own mendacious, mediocre volition, to her best.

  • Demons’ Year Off

    Demons’ Year Off

    I started in show business as an actor.  Well, strictly speaking I started as the lead singer for a rock-and-roll band, but given that I was thirteen when I auditioned for “Paradox” in Jimmy McNally’s cramped basement, and that the pinnacle of our public performances was playing the midnight “Rock ‘n Bowl” at the Timonium Fair Lanes, where Jimmy also worked as a fry cook, let’s just say for simplicity’s sake that I began my show business career as an actor.

    No one, least of all I, should argue that an actor’s work is easy; but the discipline it requires, in my experience, can be leveraged largely from external sources.  If you have some talent and ideally get a little training, then you can start auditioning for jobs.  If you manage to land those, then someone other than yourself will be telling when to show up, what to do when you do, and when to go home when the rehearsal or show is done. 

    Anyone who decides, like I did back in the late 1980’s, that they also might want to wright for the stage, soon learns that the coterie of people in place to whip-crack— the teachers, directors, and stage managers—are simply not there for playwrights.  This is because– and we all know it is true, whether or not we care to admit it– no one in or out of this business really cares if anyone ever wrights another original play. (I promise I will dedicate another essay to this subject, so save your outraged disputations to this easily provable fact for when I do.)

    So what do you do when you want to create new work in an art form that does not want new work?  And how do you drive yourself when you are used to others imposing the necessary discipline?  Well, if you are me, in the late 80’s, an impoverished, arrogant and charmless college drop-out, working as a day laborer at the National Archives, you do what your Irish Catholic forbears taught you to do: you create demons.  With time and careful nurturing, these demons will grow strong enough to drive you to create.

    I won’t enumerate the various demons I have spawned to spur me over the years.  Some are deeply personal, others closely held trade secrets.  If you want demons to propel you, conceive and grow your own.  I will share, however, a fairly prosaic one which I have employed probably with the most success over the longest periods of my career: the demon of hours tracking. 

    Here’s how it goes.  Decide how many hours you can devote to creativity in a given day, week or month.  Shoot for that goal.  If you make it easily, adjust it higher.  If you miss your mark, consider adjusting it lower, but first try again to hit it.  Keep upping your goals over the weeks, months and years of your career.  In 2010 I put in more “creative hours” in a single year than I have since 1997 when I was working full-time as a freelance documentary writer; and to my credit, I have been more conservative over the last half decade about what counts.  Back in the 90’s, when I was single and had little to care about besides putting food and booze in my mouth, getting laid and becoming the greatest playwright you might ever meet, everything I did that was even remotely creative counted against my “writing work hours”: all the movies I saw, all the books I read.  I remember describing the discipline to someone at a party and joking, “Hell, even this conversation counts.  I can count sexual fantasies against my hours, though they usually don’t take me all that long.”

    About three months ago I began to toy with the idea of giving my demons, especially the “hours-tracking” demon the year of 2011 off.  The fantasy felt delicious.  When you let demons drive you, you often find yourself feeling like you work for them instead of the other way around.  Even as I write this I’m thinking to myself, “Well, this is taking quite a while to get right, but that’s good, because it’ll count against my hours for the week.” Only it won’t, because I am not tracking them anymore.  It feels odd, like I’m writing this essay for free; but of course, I’m always writing these for free.  My only payment before was the satisfaction I got from beating back my demons for another week.

    Messing with one’s discipline has consequences.  One result will soon become apparent to readers of Just Wrought, as the output here is sure to diminish.  That is part of the plan though, since I am looking to listen more than talk going forward.  Other consequences are less predictable.  I could slip into a slough of laziness: watching more TV, reading more trashy books, staring more often out the window at nothing but the trees.  Frankly, all of that sounds pretty good right now.

    Potential upsides include happening onto new veins of creativity to mine, ones that were obscured by a slavish devotion to appeasing my demons.  Or I might finally decide to give up writing all together.  Seems unlikely, but odd things happen when you cut yourself loose.

  • It’s Been a Year

    I launched Just Wrought a year ago today with the essay “Towards a World Class Theatre”.  I am glad I did it, but now for reasons completely different from those I had when I started.  Back then I had no idea that through this blog I would gain the good friendship and professional working relationship I have with Jim Jewell, now the Managing Producer of NewsWrights United; or that I would get to know Lyam White, Jose Amador, and Omar Willey so much better.

    Conversely, I honestly did not suspect that I would lose some friends simply by saying publicly what I had always said to them in private bullshit sessions; but alas, this too is true, as some have conflated my arguments here about failures of leadership, courage and imagination in Seattle theater with personal aggression towards them and their livelihoods.  Some, but happily not all, or even most; because even more surprising than the estranged colleagues have been the artistic leaders who have reached out to me to say essentially, “I think a lot of what you say is crap, but I am glad you are saying it.”

    Just like nearly everything we do as artists—or really, humans— I have no idea if this project has succeeded, and I may never know.  I do not suspect for a minute that I have yet made even the slightest dent in the status quo of how theatre gets done in Seattle, but I do sometimes flatter myself with believing I have helped simultaneously broaden and sharpen the conversation.

    Of the thirteen formal essays I set out to write, I have managed to finish only five over the last 365 days.  Looking at the list now, I realize with certainty that I will never write at least three of them.  “Since When Are Directors Indispensable?” was going to point out that directors are a relatively new species in the long history of theatre, and that playwrights like Shakespeare and Moliere managed incomparable dramatic brilliance without them; but honestly, I don’t know of a single working playwright who leans more heavily on the talent of the directors he collaborates with than myself.  I literally cannot imagine producing Tuesday at Annex Theatre, or our current Living Newspapers, without Dawson Nichols, and the thought of the erstwhile Empty Space’s production of  Louis Slotin Sonata without John Langs at the helm, bringing together as he did all the amazing acting and design elements (not to mention his kick-ass choreography in the second act dance number) literally depresses me.  I could not do my work without directors, so what sort of non-hypocritical point was I hoping to make?  Perhaps only that the rising stock of the anti-collaborative idea of singular stage director auteurship, borrowed as it is from filmmaking, is a mistaken and destructive direction in theatre, especially when regional houses make season selections based on which plays will entice particular directors to work with them.  Throughout the 20th century stage directors gained power   mostly at the expense of playwrights.  The art form will regain health when that inequity is honestly addressed and steps are taken to resolve it.

    I also no longer plan to write about the deleterious arrangement Seattle theatre has with Actors Equity (the stage actors union), or how the viral nature of MFA programs for actors, directors and playwrights is weakening and rarifying our art form in this country.  I realize after this year of speaking out that as a college-dropout actor-turned-playwright, these are no longer my battles to fight.  Only the actors in this town can fix things so they have the same right to develop new works for the stage as actors in Los Angeles and New York; and only young people themselves can wake up and realize that chasing the imprimatur of higher education only takes them further away from the audiences that really need them, and that the excuse of needing a degree to make a living by teaching their craft only perpetuates the virus, while ultimately helping no one, including themselves.

    Of the five essays I did manage to write I am proud and stand by them.  Locally grown new plays do matter, and I see signs that Seattle is making more of them.  World Class Theatre does mean something, even when it cannot and should not be defined precisely.  Playwrights and designers can form some amazing alliances, and I earnestly hope for more of them, for myself and for the world of play development at large.  One-person shows are an easy way for a theaters to shirk the hard work of actually making new plays.  (All props and apologies to Mike Daisy, Jose Amador, Marya Sea Kaminski and everyone else who does such amazing solo work.  I don’t want you to stop.  I just want theatres to stop selling live story-telling  as “plays” {And yes, I understand that even that won’t happen.})

    That leaves five essays unwritten and unspiked.  The one most likely to see daylight in 2011 is “Stop trying to be Respectable, You’re in Show Business”; because I still see way too many of my Seattle colleagues cozying up for financial support and social legitimacy to the very same powerful interests that they should instead be looking for ways to indict theatrically.  I wish I had a condo payment for every time an otherwise  brilliant artistic administrator has baldly insisted to me that theatre is an elitist art form and therefore must depend on the good graces of corporations and  the upper class for its existence.  If I believed this, I would not only quit today, I would start doing everything I could to darken every stage currently producing plays in this city.  Thankfully, I know better.  As show people, we are at our best playing the dangerous fool, telling the wealthy and well-placed  who would teach us our art, what Lear’s Fool told Lear, “I am better than thou art now; I am a Fool, thou art nothing.”

    Just Wrought’s first year has been an often hectic, sometimes even bruising struggle.  Lately I have had to remind myself and others that I am an artist first, and an advocate only much further down my list of priorities.  Over the last few weeks I have been feeling a growing need to take time to lie fallow here for the sake of my creativity.  I resolve to listen more than I talk in 2011.  Of course that doesn’t mean I won’t be talking at all.

    Expanded conversations.  Bruising struggles over important ideas.  Greater clarity around the issues about which I should just keep quiet.

    Lost friends.  Gained friends. 

    It’s been a year.