Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

  • Frasier Takes the Stage

    Frasier Takes the Stage

    Those of us who lived in Seattle back when the sitcom Frasier was still on the air used to get a kick out of the shows many geographical gaffes.  We would laugh, shaking our heads when some character arranged a meeting at a diner on 14th street because we knew that not only was there no such restaurant in Seattle, there was no such street.  The film Sleepless in Seattle offers similar hilarities.  Characters casually stroll from Pike Place Market to Gas Works Park, and in one scene a dreamy distracted Tom Hanks paddles his son in a canoe from Portage Bay to Alki Beach: not an impossible feat, but nearly so seeing as the trip would be some twelve and a half miles by water, one-way, and require the canoe to pass through the Ballard Locks and major ferry lanes.  He should have at least worked up a sweat during the four or five hours it would have taken him.

    Frasier’s apartment has a lot in common with the apartment in The God of Carnage, which opened last night at the Seattle Rep.  It’s beautiful, meticulously appointed to indicate tasteful wealth, and it simply does not exist– because it could not exist– in Seattle.  As a private residence window cleaner in Manhattan for three years, I have seen plenty of apartments like the one I saw last night on the Rep’s stage.  A few in SoHo, a couple in the Village, but really nearly almost all of them on the Upper West Side.  As a resident of Seattle, on and off, for seventeen years I have never once seen such an apartment here, and certainly not occupied by an upper middle class couple with two young children.  The very notion is absurd.  (And not the good Ionesco kind.)

    The play proffers “Meydenbauer Park” and “the 405” and “Tukwilla” as obvious and, frankly, clunky substitutions for the actual places meant before the play’s rapid import from Broadway, namely Central Park, the FDR Highway and Long Island.  Why do I care?  Well if it were a Frasier episode on the television I wouldn’t, but this was yet another play for, by and about Upper West Siders forced down the guffawing gullets of Big House theatre goers who in reality live 2,700 miles and tens of thousands of dollars of annual salary away from the action of this play.

    Some aspects of parenthood are universal.  Of course.  But in a play like Carnage the devil is in the details, those aspects which are deeply specific to the city where one lives with one’s family: the tiny hopes and niggling fears for your children, the snobberies and slights, the lines of attack and defense.  My wife and I moved back to Seattle from New York City shortly after our first son was born precisely because we understood these deep existential differences between raising kids there compared to raising them here.  I think every parent in that audience last night shares a similar understanding, and implicitly understood further that the play they were seeing, as funny as it was—funny as Frasier frankly– had very little to do with their actual lives.

    So here’s a crazy thought, if you are going to take the trouble to substitute out words so that you can pretend a play takes place in Seattle, why not go a few steps further and substitute all of the words.   Have it written such that the story clearly lives here, thus giving your audience the genuine and irreplaceable thrill of seeing their actual experiences staged instead of those of some Upper Class Upper West-Siders.  And if you’re going to do that, then here’s an even crazier thought: have someone who lives here wright it.

  • How can I talk about The Borrowers?

    How can I talk about The Borrowers?

    One of the rules of this blog, which I have mentioned before but not adequately explained, is that I do not do stage reviews.  I see no value in my pumping or panning a particular production.  Whether recent stagings of Hamlet or The Adding Machine or Glengarry Glen Ross or other chestnuts from the canon are, or are not, up to the professional standards of excellence that Seattle theatre talent is clearly capable of achieving, I honestly do not care.  Nor, frankly, do I think anyone else does outside of this quasi-incestuous community of Seattle theatre professionals.  The discussion I want to have takes place at the next level up.  It has to do with how we can make theatre that matters to the widest possible population of human beings.  I have maintained here and elsewhere that there is something tantamount to fiddling while Rome burns about offering a production of Glengarry Glen Ross and calling it a cogent theatrical response to the recent mortgage meltdown when the play is no such thing and the mortgage meltdown had its epicenter little more than a mile due south of the Seattle Rep at the former Washington Mutual Tower at 3rd and University.  The Seattle theatre administrative elite may believe that nothing actual happens in this city, but history will certainly prove otherwise.

    So I will not offer a review of The Borrowers, which I saw this Friday, Opening Night, at Seattle Children’s Theatre.  What I can do is talk about how the play reopened my eyes to something essential about our art form.

    For those of you, like me, who did not know the story, The Borrowers is about a family of very small folk who live under the floorboards of an English house.  In the second act, after being forced from their comfortable home, the Clock family emigrates into the great out-of-doors.  At one point as they are wandering the countryside a giant crow comes on stage and threatens to eat them.  As soon as the perfectly wrought puppet bird came on stage I did what every playwright does, I turned to the audience to gauge their response–the key member in this instance being my five-year old son.  His reaction was odd.  He was staring right at the huge bird but did not seem to be seeing it.  It was as if the spectacle was so huge and strange and unlooked-for that his brain just could not process it.  And then suddenly he stiffened.  He saw the bird.  The giant bird.  I stiffened too, because if there was going to be a moment when my little boy would start bawling in fear, this was surely it.  And then something amazing happened.  His eyes widened.  And then a huge wonder-filled grin spread across his face.  He looked over at me and said, “I know there’s a person inside that bird.  I can see his feet.”  This knowledge did not ruin his experience of the moment: exactly the contrary.  His knowing there was a person in that bird allowed my son to fully enjoy the wonder of the story. 

    This is important.  This is something essential about theatre.  Our challenge is not to fool people, but to charm them.  The audience neither needs nor wants us to convince them we are, say, Hamlet or Louis Slotin.  They need us to convince them that being these beings matters as part of the human experience. 

    Let me track the essential trajectory again:  something giant happens on stage the likes of which our audience member has never seen before.  Said audience member cannot at first even process the experience.  Then comes a shock of recognition of a huge, potentially horrifying truth.  Finally, audience member realizes that this truth is only human after all.

    Everything that happens on stage is human.  Everything.

    As Pod Clock, the Borrower family father who fights off the giant crow Ian Bell was superb as usual, but remember, I am not reviewing this show and therefore am not officially recommending you go see his delightful performance.  Nor am I suggesting that you share, along with your family the awe that Emily Chisholm, as his daughter Arrietty, channels upon seeing an open field for the first time: “It is a sea!  It is a sea!”  Surely I would never tell you go see Marianne Owen, who so effortlessly balances the flustered chatty charm of Mrs. Clock with a steely core of loyalty for her family.  Nor will I recommend Chris Ensweiler’s tour de force romp through four characters each so distinctly drawn– but more importantly, distinctly fun!– that you had trouble keeping in mind that it was the same person playing them.

    I cannot recommend any of them.  That is not what I do here.  Remember?

  • Seattle Likes its Playwrights Nice

    Seattle Likes its Playwrights Nice

    I wrote that in my pocket notebook while bussing it home recently from a happy hour with a highly placed Big House theatre administrator.  We were having that well-worn vodka-sodden conversation about how, while very few new works get developed in Seattle lately, the ones that do tend to be by the same “go-to” authors, invariably defended with some variation of the following:

    “Say what you will about the innocuousness of his plays, _______ really is the nicest guy.”

    “Sure _____’s work isn’t that strong or well-researched but she’s just so darned sweet.”

    Having jotted down that title, it was my intention go back and explore the idea in one of my longer essays, but now, looking at them I realize that if those five words don’t already make manifest the problem, another thousand won’t paint the picture any clearer.

  • NewsWrights United has Hit the Ground, and We are Running

    NewsWrights United has Hit the Ground, and We are Running

    A few days ago the NewsWrights United’s Managing Producer, Jim Jewell, sent out a kick-off press release to all sorts of fancy media folks about NewsWrights United and our upcoming production The New New News: A Living Newspaper.  In it he made a few key announcements:

    • NewsWrights United will be producing a second edition of our Living Newspaper called The New New News, on the heels of the frankly astounding success of our first edition It’s Not In the P-I: A Living Newspaper about a Dying NewspaperThe New New News will provide a theatrical examination of the rise of new media and how we know what we know… or not.
    • NewsWrights United will be tossing this Living Newspaper up onto your theatrical doorstep in February of 2011 (and by “theatrical doorstep” I mean a Seattle stage or stages to be named later.)
    • NewsWrights United just launched our blog, conveniently located at http://newswrightsunited.blogspot.com/.  On this blog my fellow writer/producers and I will do our best to keep up-to-date on our progress developing The New New News for production.  As much as we can, we keep you apprised of our hopes, our fears, our failures, and ideally, our ultimate triumph.   See?  That’s what’s exciting about locally grown, intensely fresh new work.  The outcome is not a foregone conclusion.  Following us is like rooting for a local sports team, whereas supporting our more museumified colleagues is more like, well, supporting a museum.  (Tantamount-to-dead things don’t readily engender lively metaphors.)
    • NewsWrights United just launched a “wiki-scene” here, where anyone who wants to can help us write a section of the upcoming show.
    • We have a web page: http://www.newswrightsunited.org  it ain’t super fancy yet, but it will be.  (And any support you can offer us in that regard would be most welcome.)
    • We will be hosting  an awareness-building/fund-raising event on the evening of Monday, November 15, tentatively titled Journalism: a.WAKE.ning? in the Upstairs Gallery above Theatre Off Jackson, from 7:30 – 9:30 PM.  The event will include art installations examining new media, a preview of The New New News, a panel discussion on coverage of the November elections and, of course, a reception, in which guests will be offered their choice of a flute of champagne or a shot of rye, depending on whether they think journalism is ready for a new baptism or last rites. So HOLD THAT DATE!  

    A couple of things Jim did not mention but that I wanted you to know as my special Just Wrought readers:

    • NewsWrights United has a Face Book page.  Go there by clicking http://www.facebook.com/NewsWrightsUnited  and then “like” us.  That’s one the quickest easiest ways to stay on top of our mercurial movements.
    • NewsWrights United has a twitter profile: “NewsWrights” Follow us.  (We have been, admittedly, Twitter-resistant in the past, but since half our stories involve the tool, and most actual journalists appear to be addicted to it, we figure we would look like idiots if we did not tweet.  (And possibly still look like idiots when we do.)

    Now rest assured, we’re going to be asking you for money to support this production.  And not just for the obvious reasons, like we like ourselves, think you will too, and need money to put on a show.  We also have some not so obvious reasons for asking for you support, such as:

    1. Every performance of our Living Newspapers is offered on a suggested donation basis.  We do this because we believe information and art should be as accessible as possible, and not just for those lucky few—and ever fewer—folks that can afford the enormous sum demanded for a theatre ticket these days.
    2. Journalism costs money.  To gather the news and to disseminate it.  NewsWrights United is no different, except we have actors and production designers and staff to pay to help display and distribute our news instead of printers and truck drivers.  We want you to participate directly in the financially supporting the journalism we provide, because such participation is the fair price of democracy.
    3. We are covering YOU!  We aren’t just staging Titus Andronicus or Glenngary Glen Ross because we want to, and  then making tortured arguments about how these plays are somehow relevant to your own stories today.  We are telling your own stories today!  We believe that ought to be worth something to you. 

    So here’s our hat.  You can start filling it by clicking on it.  It’ll take you to our Shunpike donation page.   

    Donation hat

    Early support is always deeply appreciated support.  So thanks.

    We have hit the ground.  We have spread out and chased down stories from sources all over this town and beyond.  We have begun to stitch them together into a script.  From this moment we will not stop until we give you the freshest, hardest-hitting local news-based theatre you have ever seen.

  • When Plays Pay in Odd Ways

    When Plays Pay in Odd Ways

    My play The Sequence has made me more money than any other play I have written.  This is true, even though The Sequence has only been fully produced once, at the Theatre @ Boston Court in Pasadena in 2008, and I did not receive any more than the usual compensation for that production.  How can this be?  For starters, The Sequence was a commission, meaning that, through a generous grant from EST/Sloan Project, I was paid up front simply to write it.  And while that commission was larger than any I had previously received, it was not huge by any measure, and certainly did not exceed the total that, say, Louis Slotin Sonata had brought in by that time through productions.  However, once I had a full draft of the script—albeit by no means final—I started getting inquiries from bio-tech organizations interested in hosting readings of the The Sequence at various symposiums and meetings around the country.  After a few of these readings, I became bored and started charging more than I thought  anyone would pay.  They paid anyway.  And thus I came to learn what should have been obvious in the first place: bio tech organizations have more money than regional theatres, and less myopia around where good plays can come from and what they are worth.

    Now another yet-to-be produced play threatens to vaguely embarrass me by making money through means even less tangentially related to theatre.  My most recent full-length on-spec script is called Gossamer Grudges, and presents the story of a family-owned business devoted to “holding your grudges so you don’t have to.”  I have been nursing this premise for several years on the belief that it was deliciously absurd enough to fuel a proper full-on farce.  All that time I never guessed it might be absurd enough to inspire an actual business. 

    Here’s a link to the first in what surely will be a long line of promotional videos for a new service called Grudgr, uniquely poised to—you guessed it— hold your grudges so you don’t have to.

    Adam and Eve by GRUDGR 

    Negotiations around my compensation for inspiring this business are on-going.  It could well be I won’t see a penny.  I am notoriously stupid when it comes to predicting the success of Hollywood enterprises.  I remember a phone conversation I had with Jeff Probst over a decade ago in which he told me about his upcoming television show wherein ordinary people would compete to be the last person on an desert island.  I remember thinking as I got off the phone, “Poor guy.  What a stupid idea.  They’re going to cancel that crap in two weeks tops.”

  • Another Sample of MSK’s Insight on her Award Day

    Another Sample of MSK’s Insight on her Award Day

    Every truly great actor whom I know personally possesses something that all of the just-almost-great actors whom I personally know utterly lack.  (I must tread carefully now.)  Actors like Marya Sea Kaminski and William Salyers, with whom I inevitably compare her, nurse a kernel of contempt for the charms of their craft.  Or is it contempt?  Disdain? Skepticism may be kinder, if not more accurate.  They quietly eschew that most of loathsome habit of actors, self-back-patting.

    SELF-BACK-PATTING ACTOR: “How many people do you know who can do what I do on stage?”

    EVERYONE ELSE: “Well… not many, but perhaps that’s a blessing?

    Great actors do not celebrate themselves.  Great actors, perhaps to a fault, don’t celebrate much at all in the theatre (unless, of course, the character they are playing is celebrating).  They are almost always too busy, too focused, keeping their heads down and digging deeper.   They understand that the show is not them, but that, counter-intuitively, they are in fact the show.  And thus people keep coming back to see them, or not them, per se, but them breathing, them giggling, them preening prancing prattling, sloppily kissing, them dying and killing, them living.  Or put another way, them [anything but acting].

    One of the reasons Marya is such a pleasure to work with is that she quietly leans her brain more deeply into the art than most of her colleagues.  Evidence, is it, you need?  This from her current Stranger feature explaining why she was given this year’s Genius Award for Theatre.

    …that’s the fear that people have been talking about with the Method since the beginning,” she says. “I can think about my dog getting hit and get teary—until the day thinking about my dog getting hit doesn’t get me teary anymore. And then I’ve failed in two ways: I’ve failed to bring an honest emotion to the stage and I’ve numbed myself to that personal experience.”

    Simply. . .

    Briliant.

    That’s Marya.

  • Chicago Public Radio Glows for Slotin

    Chicago Public Radio Glows for Slotin

    I was determined not to bore you with reviews from the Chicago premiere of Louis Slotin Sonata, but this one from Chicago Public Radio, WBEZ, has several things going for it:

    1. It’s extremely short.
    2. It’s completely, unequivocally positive. 🙂
    3. And you don’t have to read it.  You can just listen to it here.

    Money pull-quote: 

    “… Intellectualy thrilling and rigorous.  It really is a must see.”

    *Inside Baseball: Vocally, this critic Kelly Kleiman sounds remarkably like The Seattle Times’ Misha Berson; only difference being she doesn’t hate my guts…yet. 

    Just one more reason to love the Windy City!

  • Steve Schine Joins a Very Exclusive Club

    Steve Schine Joins a Very Exclusive Club

    Gotta say, my Chicago home boy, Steve Schine, is practically a dead ringer.  Don’t ya think?

    Compare with . . . Louis Slotin in his Los Alamos mug shot

    No dis,  mind you, on my former Slotin homeboys, the inestimable Paul Morgan Stetler (The Empty Space Theatre, Seattle) and the seminal William Salyers (Circle X Theatre, Los Angeles and Ensemble Studio Theatre, New York).

    Paul Morgan Stetler as Hollywood SlotinWilliam Salyers as Louis Slotin as Joey Mengele

  • Sun-Times Previews A Red Orchid’s Slotin Nicely

    Sun-Times Previews A Red Orchid’s Slotin Nicely

    Ask anyone who’s been doing theatre long enough and they’ll tell you, “I don’t care if they review me so long as they preview me.” 

    Well, The Chicago Sun-Times just gave a very nice one here to A Red Orchid’s Chicago premiere of Louis Slotin Sonata, which will be starting preview’s tonight, on my birthday! 

  • A Red Orchid’s Poster for Louis Slotin Sonata

    A Red Orchid’s Poster for Louis Slotin Sonata

    The poster for the new production of Louis Slotin Sonata in Chicago. . .

    I have to say…

    I like it.

    I like it very much. 

    Eye-witness accounts of atomic blasts invariably share some sentiment to the effect that the explosion’s aftermath easily rates as the most beautiful and simultaneously horrible sight the witness has ever seen.  Richard Rhodes collects page after amazing page of first-hand reports from the test shot at Trinity in his seminal history, The Making of the Atomic Bomb.  Here’s just one from J. Robert Oppenheimer’s brother Frank: 

    And so there was this sense of this ominous cloud hanging over us.  It was so brilliant purple with all the radioactive glowing.  And it just seemed to hang there forever.  Of course it didn’t.  It must have been  just a very short time until it went up.  It was very terrifying.

    And the thunder from the blast.  It bounced on the rocks, and then it went—I don’t know where else it bounced.  But it never seemed to stop.  Not like an ordinary echo with thunder.  It just kept echoing back and forth in that Jornada del Meurto.

    By cropping the mushroom cloud neatly by half, the designer has de-iconized the image, forcing us to look again more closely at the amazing, disturbing forms and colors, not to mention the cloud’s sheer enormity.

    Posters are for putting butts in seats.  I have no idea if this will do that.  But I could stare at it all day.

    May human eyes never witness such beauty again.